User talk:Liberalagitator

August 2022

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jocelyn Benson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:06, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using partisan sources

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:41, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That edit took out the problems and did use a good source. Can we please discuss these things on talk pages rather than edit summaries in the future?

Also, I am concerned about the username "liberal agitator". If you want to be here, I suggest choosing a non-hostile name. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, then went back to my first instinct. Your edit warring to put in In March 2021, State Court of Claims Judge Christopher M. Murray ruled that Benson unilaterally broke Michigan election laws by issuing illegal guidance on absentee ballots. But, the source says The judge didn't rule on whether Benson's directive violated state election law, but did say the directive violated the Administrative Procedures Act, the process that must be followed when an agency creates new rules. " I don't think you're here to build the encyclopedia, "liberal agitator". – Muboshgu (talk) 05:06, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]