User talk:Liamjflood

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Otmoor riots

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Otmoor riots, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/leisure/history_heritage/folklore/845449.The_Otmoor_riots/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Otmoor riots

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Otmoor riots, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/leisure/history_heritage/folklore/845449.The_Otmoor_riots/. As a copyright violation, Otmoor riots appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Otmoor riots has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Otmoor riots and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Otmoor riots with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Otmoor riots.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Otmoor riots

Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Otmoor riots. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Otmoor riots. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Islip, Oxfordshire

Thankyou for your additions to Islip, Oxfordshire. In order to manage the material I have created a separate St Nicholas' Church, Islip article, moved the material about the parish church, Confessor's Chapel and Old Rectory there, and left only a summary in the Islip, Oxfordshire article. I have also reordered and condensed the remaining material in the original article.

I have also formatted your inline citations with full details of each of the books from which they have been digitised. This was a fiddly job, but necessary for the true sources of citations to be clear to the reader. It should also make the article look tidier. Best wishes, Motacilla (talk) 02:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boat-building at Islip

I did not retain the paragraph about boat-building in Islip, Oxfordshire because it was copied almost verbatim from "Islip". Otmoor Notice Board., which makes it a copyright violation. Also the Otmoor Notice Board fails to cite its sources, so the account is not verifiable.

However, if Islip did have a boat-building yard that may be notable local history. Compton, Hugh J. (1976). The Oxford Canal. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. pp. 31–32. ISBN 0 7153 7238 6. briefly outlines attempts at commercial boat transport on the Cherwell and the Ray which began during the English Civil War, had some success in the first half of the 18th century but seem to have petered out after the Banbury — Oxford road was turnpiked in 1755. It is a sketchy account, but research may have found more evidence in the 35 years since The Oxford Canal was published. Therefore, if you can find a verifiable historical source for Islip having a boat-building yard, either opposite the Swan Inn or anywhere else in the parish, please feel welcome to insert a brief account in an appropriate place in Islip, Oxfordshire#Economic and social history.

Thankyou, Motacilla (talk) 08:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gro Marie Svidal

The article Gro Marie Svidal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 20:53, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gro Marie Svidal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gro Marie Svidal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 07:04, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]