User talk:Liamdogger

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sisters of Mercy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 01:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Stainless steel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liam mccoy

A tag has been placed on Liam mccoy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fabian Hassler (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Strathfield massacre, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Strathfield massacre was changed by Liamdogger (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-11-28T22:57:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Strathfield massacre constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. vvv^t 23:00, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Strathfield massacre. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WAYNEOLAJUWON 23:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pope, you may be blocked from editing. SMasters (talk) 01:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Vandalism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Seaphoto^Talk 07:35, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Lear's Fool 07:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]