User talk:Lewbertswart45

November 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nate • (chatter) 07:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i haven't done any "disruptive edits", just putting back content that was removed for NO REASON! Lewbertswart45 (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's from what's basically a TV Guide. There is no TV listings that I know of that show what's on four weeks into the future. Thus, it's an unreliable source, and again, all shows always have a celebrity episode or week. It's called 'cross-promotion'. It's not very notable at all. Nate • (chatter) 07:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

its only not notable because you hate the show just ignore the article Lewbertswart45 (talk) 07:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and theres also these where miranda confirms that she was a contestant: http://showhype.com/story/miranda-cosgrove-brain-surge-is-crazy/

and then these: http://www.icarly-show.com/blog/tag/brain-surge/

and this, probably the most reliable of the three: http://www.jsyk.com/2009/09/03/nickelodeon-launches-new-game-show-brainsurge/

and TONS of other ones. this is undoubtetly real, face it.. and undo your edit to the total drama action talk page, you had no reason to remove my comment! Lewbertswart45 (talk) 07:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal was justified; you are not allowed to edit beyond your talk page during a block, especially on an account used to evade sanctions on the former account. And all three of your cites are ineligible per WP:ELNO. Nate • (chatter) 11:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

now you're jsut being stubborn, face the facts, the appearances are real, MSN TV is not user-created

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

-- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lewbertswart45 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

alright, sure, i am tdinoahfan. why did i make another account? because tdinoahfan was banned for NO REASON and i was ready to be calmer and stuff and nboody would listen to what i had ot say, then i ended up getting overly pissed off, so i basically had no choice! please forgive me, ihadnt been aware i couldnt make a new account.

Decline reason:

Please request unblocking from your original account (tdinoahfan). Creating new accounts to evade blocks is never allowed. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lewbertswart45 (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it wont let me edit my talk page on tdinoahfan...Lewbertswart45 (talk) 03:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's becuse of talk page abuse; it won't make it any easier for you to get a different account unblocked. You can still request an unblock by email - the address is unblock-en-l@unblock-en-l-at-lists.wikimedia.org. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]