User talk:LevelMeasurement6553

don’t ban me

please don’t ban or block me LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello LevelMeasurement6553 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Spart, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! violetwtf (talk) 05:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your messages

in WP:TEAHOUSE, you should have ended your topic with ~~~~. These 4 tildes automatically convert to a signature, just like the one you'll see at the end of this topic. We need to know who you are to help you. Also, add new topics to the end of the talkpage, not the beginning. It's alright, you're new, but you've eventually got to learn how Wikipedia works. 〜Festucalex: talk • contribs 06:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why should i sign it? LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 06:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So that we know who you are. It's common etiquette. Would it make much sense for me to leave an anonymous message on your talk page? You'd wonder who that is. But now, you can see who Festucalex is by using the signature to see my userpage, talkpage, and contributions. 〜Festucalex • talk • contribs 06:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SIG for more info on signatures. 〜Festucalex • talk • contribs 06:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Lightning strike did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Your edit on Lightning strike did not appear constructive and made no sense. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am very sorry but i am a new user

most lightning strikes are cloud flashes not ground flashes LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 22:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this appears to be vandalism 22:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC), by LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Candidates_for_speedy_deletion_as_attack_pages&oldid=1099023465 LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 22:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for either general incompetence and socking or outright trolling (given your deleted edits).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LevelMeasurement6553 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have not made any disparaging, attacking, or threatening pages LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 23:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We can see your deleted sandbox. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 00:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 23:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LevelMeasurement6553 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not delete my sandbox ,and I now realise that other users may see my sandbox . I will make constructive edits including but not limited to the correction of misspellings, balancing chemical formulae, correcting misconceptions/misinformation as well as making recommended edits.LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 10:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks, WP:NONAZIS. Yamla (talk) 11:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LevelMeasurement6553 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not a nazi and am asian-i made the incorrect assumption that the sandbox was an appropriate place to swear, say rude things,and be profane as a way to destress LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a place to release stress and is not therapy. Scream racist and offensive language in your residence as much as you want- you can't do it here. Furthermore, Wikipedia is no different than a public street, anything you do is visible and communicates to others your mindset whether you intend to or not. You may not be a literal Nazi, but your views are incompatible with this collaborative project with people of all races/nationalities/religions/gender/ you name it. No thanks. Maybe after some time to reflect on this, maybe. 331dot (talk) 12:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LevelMeasurement6553 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i greatly apologise for my racist language, and I promise never to use it again I am not-a nazi, a professional scientist,or an idiot-I am just a clever Chinese guy that wants to help contribute to correct information on Wikipedia So please don’t bite the newcomers and unblock me from editing the english — Preceding unsigned comment added by LevelMeasurement6553 (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

What the hell. Racists are not welcome here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

not a nazi

I am not a nazi - in fact I am a person of color myself LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, glad to hear it. However, we judge you by your actions. Wikipedia doesn't tolerate blatantly and deliberately offensive racism. You are very, very unlikely to be unblocked in the near future. --Yamla (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the word n*gger was used not to cause offence but rather an attempt to destress from life

please assume good faith LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have no tolerance for that sort of racist language here, none at all. Additionally, many of your other edits were problematic, albeit not racist. --Yamla (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which edits? LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests for your currently active block, as you illicitly did here. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 11:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you find evidence for not being allowed to edit my declined requests?LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be Wikipedia:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK. We're not making this stuff up. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm it appears that that tag relates to deletions, not edits!?LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 05:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is truely disallowed I greatly apologise and I also ask you to please review my unblock～～～～ LevelMeasurement6553 (talk) 05:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #81512

is under review. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:51, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
is closed.

Thank you for using UTRS. Unfortunately, the use of the word you used precludes unblocking, as was stated on your talk page. Even if you do not see/describe yourself as a racist, it is something for which the community has zero tolerance. As Yamla has said, “[y]ou are very, very unlikely to be unblocked in the near future.” However, 331dot tendered the possibility of requesting unblocking after time for reflection. So. I will provide that time.

I see you have edited simplewikipedia, therefore I recommend you edit there for a significant amount of time. Or, if there is another language you speak well, you could edit the Wikipedia in that language. We usually require a minimum of six months and five hundred problem-free edits on another Wikipedia to establish eligibility for consideration of unblocking. You would still need to convincingly deal with the concerns raised on your talk page to have a hope of being unblocked. If your request at UTRS is sufficient, one of us will restore your talk page access for you to request unblocking there. Thank you for your consideration, Best-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]