User talk:Levcos

Please read the full language of the articles and its history, before taking issue with it.

Why do you leave information that is lacking support on the article Eli Verschleiser. You write ″Verschleiser purchased the right to use the Trump name from the Trump Organization in his attempt to construct the Trump Tower″.

In addition you state that ″Verschleiser formed VTE as a principal of the Multi Group of Companies″.

Where do you get that from? Are you assuming that Verschleiser formed the company VTE? The articles cited never mention such, one article states that Multi was a partner while the others state that Multi was the financier of the project. Perhaps this information may belong on a page for Multi.

Vandalism

This page has been vandalised by an apparent nemesis, and it has been going on for quite sometime. If you are in fact so experienced you can clearly see what has happened by simply looking at the history.

I simply reverted the page back to or as close to the page on April 7th 2015 by User:Mike_V prior to all the vandalism. In fact if you take the time to read the history of the page you will see that on May 2 2015 User:Mike_V protected the page ^[1] because of the vandalism.

You should look at the complete history of a page and see what's been going on before simply making revisions that are unsupported.

Levcos ^{02:50:, 13 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.113.142.78 (talk)}

July 2017[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jacob Frydman. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Once again, I refer you to WP:BLPPRIMARY. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Levcos. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Jacob Frydman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:38, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All information is highly cited. Unsure what the conflict of interest is. Seems like User:Malik Shabazz may be paid by individual.Levcos (talk) 07:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Hello Levcos,

You are engaged in a slow motion edit war to insert contentious material at Jacob Frydman. That violates our policy on biographies of living people. Please stop now. You must gain consensus of all editors interested in this article before adding any of this content, and it must comply with policy. In addition, you have accused another editor of being paid by Frydman without offering any evidence. This is unacceptable and disruptive, and you must stop. Your pattern of editing indicates that you are here on Wikipedia to promote one real estate investor and denigrate another real estate investor. This is a formal warning: If you continue this behavior, you will be blocked from editing. Stop this behavior now. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have blocked you indefinitely for repeated BLP violations, for slow motion edit warring, and for repeated unsubstantiated accusations of paid editing against another editor. Your behavior is not acceptable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ Protected Eli Verschleiser: sockpuppetry/BLP concerns}}

[1] Protected Eli Verschleiser: sockpuppetry/BLP concerns}}

[1]