Jump to content

User talk:Letcreate123/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Ping

Hey, just wanted to let you know that that doesn't work, see Template:Reply_to#Usage: "The edit that adds this template must be signed with new signature tildes, or the notification(s) will not work." — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

18:39:53, 6 June 2015 review of submission by Bobhurteau


Bobhurteau (talk) 18:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC) Dear ToonLucas22: as you may have guessed, this is my first time creating a Wikipedia page. The article I have submitted is brief, meant only to get at least a reference to Rev. John Joseph Considine on Wikipedia. As I am the author of a biography of Fr. Considine (Hurteau, Robert. A Worldwide Heart: The Life of Maryknoll Father John J. Considine. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2013.), I can certainly add more, but thought it was important first just to get the most basic information about him and his contributions posted. As you will note in my re-submission, I have included links to other Wikipedia pages. In doing so, I note that there is a Wikipedia page for Kenneth Scott Latourette, Considine's friend and contemporary; I wonder why that Protestant scholar of Christian missions is deserving of a Wikipedia page and not Fr. Considine? The both were extensively published.

Thank you for your work on this.

18:48:54, 6 June 2015 review of submission by Bobhurteau


Bobhurteau (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear ToonLucas22: I just now left you a message on this talk page, but after doing so noticed I had failed to sign my post. Please let me know if you did not receive it; thanks for your work on this. Bobhurteau (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

User:PrincessBulldog

Knock it off. Editors can put random text and test edits on their user pages. G1 does not apply to the userspace. Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Personal attack on my talk page

Please, avoid it. I followed strictly Wikipedia rules by posting POV section on the article talkpage.--72.66.12.17 (talk) 22:18, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

A warning concerning editing behavior that is or is approaching edit warring is not a personal attack, especially when it comes from an experienced editor. You would be well-advised to heed the warning, rather than complaining about it. General Ization Talk 22:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi. Edits of yours were referred to recently in a discussion at AfC. I thought I would therefore just remind you to thoroughly read WP:NPP and above all avoid tagging for deletion within minus of creation. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

@Kudpung:  Question: What discussion? I checked the help desk of AFC and didn't see anything. --TL22 (talk) 13:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
This edit was mentioned here. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
A7 doesn't state that an article can't be deleted as not having a credible claim of significance if the subject is notable. Articles may be speedily deleted if they don't have a credible claim of significance even if the subject is actually notable. Feel free to discuss it though. --TL22 (talk) 14:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
From WP:NPP: In particular, an article should not be tagged for speedy delete using A7 for not being notable (in your opinion): an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, it only has to pass the much lower test of asserting importance or significance (whether it actually is notable is a subject for an AfD discussion, not a speedy deletion). Consider using a Notability tag instead of a speedy delete tag. Also, an article should not be tagged for speedy deletion if it's possible that it might be improved into an article which should be kept. Pay attention to the guideline "Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete." It is not a rule of Wikipedia that an article has to be perfect the instant it's first posted; that's why we have edits. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
You misunderstand. If the general subject is notable but the article does not claim notability or a credible claim of significance it may be speedily deleted. --TL22 (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
But "famous for co-writing and directing the television series NY-LON and the horror film Incubus, starring Tara Reid" is a claim of notability (specifically, a claim of item 3 of WP:FILMMAKER). An even if there is no claim of notability for a potentially notable subject, flagging the article under A7 within seconds of creation because it hasn't yet made such a claim goes against the second part of the text I quoted above (the part about not tagging a page soon after creation because it appears incomplete). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
I think there is actually a lot of misunderstanding here and that leads me to belive that the recommendation at WP:NPP are also misunderstood or not being followed, or simply have not been read. The page at NPP needs prospective patrollers to sit down, read it thoroughy, understand it, and then start patrolling. ToonLucas22 has evidently missed the part that infers that A1 and A3 should not be tagged for deletion within minutes of creation unless they are obvious;y a joke, vandalism, or plain nonsense - in which case we also have separate CSD categories.; There is no rule on Wikipedia that articles may not be developed straight away in mainspace (unfortunately), so any one-liner that is not toxic should be given time to see if the creator has any itention of developing it further. That's why the Curation Toolbar clearly states 'This article was only created X minutes ago' and it is also a policy that Caution is needed when using this tag on newly created articles.. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to User:Andhisteam does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Compassionate727 (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

I did not include an edit summary because it wasn't pretty much necessary, and please avoid templating the regulars (altrough there may be exceptions, such as warning others of edit warring). --TL22 (talk) 13:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Alright, though please include an edit summary anyway: it helps us recent changes patrollers decide whether or not we need to check for vandalism. Compassionate727 (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring report

Thank you for making that. I was working on it, but have never done it before and was kind of confused. lol --Shadow (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Help?

The user I reported on 3RR is continually vandalizing the title of my report. They've added and reverted me 3 times, anything that can be done? Calibrador (talk) 15:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

FYI they did it again. Calibrador (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
I said I wouldn't be involved in the discussion anymore. Now don't poke me with the stick. --TL22 (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Why you remove my comment?

[1] I read WP:CANVASS, says "In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus." 82.11.33.86 (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @IP, I don't know why you don't get the point? How is a Pakistani province within the scope of Indian WikiProject? Calling others to help you is simply canvassing. How can Indian Wikipedians broaden the participation on a Pakistani province? Faizan (talk) 18:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
The noticeboard is for the subject of India-related topics, it's not just for Indian Wikipedian editors. Liz Read! Talk! 19:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your comment at RFPP

Please do not formally process requests at RFPP. [2] Comments are welcomed but unless there's a special need, the final decision should be an admin's. In this case, your comment was not precisely accurate. The request is for create protection of a deleted article. --NeilN talk to me 20:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

WP:LAME

never heard of that before. excellent reading. thanks Aaabbb11 (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:DR (disambiguation) has been accepted

Wikipedia:DR (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Archiving WP:AN3

Hello ToonLucas22. I did some manual archiving, and the board is now caught up, with no reports showing their last edit more than 48 hours ago. We are still hoping that Special:Contributions/Lowercase sigmabot III will return to a full schedule of work. EdJohnston (talk) 18:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

GaryColemanFan

Just a note to you directly if you can assist. Gary has been uncivil towards me as of late and I am unable to find the appropriate place to report it. His reporting of me for edit warring (which I have responded to) is a part of this incivility. I don't want to include that in the edit warring report because I want that judged on it's merits. Adding the incivility will just cloud the whole thing outside of it's intention on that noticeboard. His incivility extends to his incredible paranoia over the banned user Justa Punk - reporting two IP's upon one "suspicious" edit only, and his reaction to my challenge on his talk page - which he removed. My side of the conversation can be seen on my talk page under "Justa Punk" (I can't link it at present as my page doesn't have enough sections). Curse of Fenric (talk) 22:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

2015 Copa America

Hi ToonLucas22, pero veo que hablas castellano asi que te dejo la referencia respecto a que en la Copa America se entrega medalla de bronce para el cuarto lugar http://www.conmebol.com/sites/default/files/reglamento_copa_america_chile_2015_-_pagina_web_.pdf en el cual en el capitulo XII, art. 37 inciso 2 menciona sobre las medallas a otorgar. Aca te dejo una foto http://sportelling.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/regular_copa_medallas-300x185.jpg. --Tar Des 61hb (talk) 02:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

My native language is Spanish, but please use English when talking to others in the English Wikipedia. That way others can understand your message. --TL22 (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Chester Creek

June 29th,

On June 6th you rejected a submission on the Chester Creek Trail. You cited the reason as there being another entry on the same topic. I altered the title to include ',Anchorage' and attempted to resubmit it as different than the other Chester Creek that is in Pennsylvania. Can you please let me know where that resubmitted text went and what the status is on its submission. Thanks for the help. Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpstiegler (talk • contribs) 19:15, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Note

See WP:TPO. From reading your talk page I see this is not the first time you have overstepped your authority. I know you mean well, but you can ease up a bit. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

SPA tag and me

Hi there- I noticed you went through my user page and changed all the signatures to normal. I do appreciate this, but I should let you know- for a while there, the SPA tag essentially was my signature because people kept going around adding it to every comment I made everywhere, and I found it dissuaded them from doing so. I thought it was clever, but it wasn't perhaps the most dignified of moves I could make. I've changed it to something normal now. Thank you. PeterTheFourth (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

list of bean to bar chocolate makers

Chonkat (talk) 20:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC) thanks for your input. where do you suggest i post the links to the articles that validate the entry for it to be included?


My RfA

Pavlov's RfA reward

Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Oppose so you get only one cookie, but a nice one. (Better luck next time.)
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC).

(unnamed section)

Say will you suggest some old kids shows like zixx, My Giant Friend and Sushi pack for Discovery Family, from Orlandojr Moonsammy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.254.5 (talk)

NHHAUGHERS message

I do not require permission for you to edit my page. So, I suggest you stand down, stay away from my business and leave me in peace AND AS A RESULT, everything will be cool!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NHHAUGHERS (talk • contribs) 21:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your userpage is a blatant violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST and as such it must be deleted. --TL22 (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, ToonLucas22. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles in a week with collaborative editing.

Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Esquivalience t 03:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi ToonLucas22, thanks for your review. I was thinking to add some music artist names related and already present on wikipedia. Do you think can this helps to improve the page?

Thanks Nickfedrigo (talk) 14:15, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Impossible Game has been accepted

The Impossible Game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Request for comment

An editor has asked for a discussion on the deprecation of Template:English variant notice. Since you've had some involvement with the English variant notice template, you might want to participate in the discussion if you have not already done so.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 07:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

please close the deletion discussion

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Blatant attempt at campaigning

Hello, you said at "I'm not gonna bother you anymore."[3]

But you put my article up for deletion:

RE: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_14#Template:Article_Rescue_Squadron_New_article

  • CLOSE DELETION DISCUSSION Please see:
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Headtransplant_reported_by_User:ToonLucas22_.28Result:_.29
ToonLucas reported me for 3RR, when I argued the 3RR, he stalked my edits, then put this template up for deletion.
Headtransplant (talk) 03:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Please change your !vote to not delete.

Thank you. Headtransplant (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

deleting your comments

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Since you deleted my comments on your talk page as "worthless", I am deleting your templating on my talk page. Headtransplant (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

That's it

Many months ago, I informed you about what a git Malik Shabazz was. You disagreed. And now, I have been proven right and you have been proven wrong. He's been desysopped. Please realise your mistake. 103.6.159.75 (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

@103.6.159.75: Just drop the stick, man. While I agree Malik should hace acted more calmly to that "sonny boy" harassment he received, that's not a reason to continue talking about something that died out 6 months ago. Also, Wikipedia is not about winning. --TL22 (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

(unnamed section)

I was trying to report a user my phone was jumping around. I still wish to do so.TheRealEricB207 (talk) 23:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

TheRealEricB207 Perhaps try using a computer instead? Its easier to handle. --TL22 (talk) 23:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

So you're the editor

...that I copied my sig. colours of. Thank you very much! Luxure Σ 12:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sarowar Parvej

A tag has been placed on User:Sarowar Parvej requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanJoe (talk) 04:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Prod of Jive Communications

Did you decline the prod of Jive Communications, or did you remove the tag procedurally because no reason was given? I'm trying to decide how to proceed since Liberalarmb (talk · contribs) has (re)prodded it. —C.Fred (talk) 15:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

@Liberalarmb: Actually I procedurally removed the tag since no reason was given, but the PROD now had the summary "too much paid articles", I contested it with the summary "consult WP:COIN for that instead". --TL22 (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Again all is paid on there references. Please stop making me fell stupid. This is paid http://www.prweb.com/releases/voip/news/prweb12435091.htm and many more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalarmb (talk • contribs)

You mean the addition of the references or the creation of the references? For the former, please consult the conflict of interest noticeboard. For the latter, it doesn't imply the Wikipedia article. --TL22 (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

I am saying all the references don't make sense. They are not authoritative enough. Its what I meant to say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberalarmb (talk • contribs) 19:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

@Liberalarmb: There is no speedy deletion criteria for "paid articles" or "nonsense references", see WP:CSD. --TL22 (talk) 19:37, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The dress

ToonLucas22, what have you done to the article The dress (viral phenomenon)?? Prhartcom (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Someone moved it to "The dress (meme)". The title appeared non-neutral to me so I reverted it. However I noticed I had mispelled the title so I nominated the original title for speedy deletion G6. --TL22 (talk) 19:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
That's not how you do it. Instead, next time go to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. It's done; it's all taken care of. Prhartcom (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
As the editor who moved it to "(meme)" in the first place, how the fuck is that non-neutral? You need to back up your actions with legitimate rationale. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Chase. your move was controversial and it was reverted (incorrectly, but it is done correctly now). If you wish, you are welcome to go to Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves but I suggest first raising the topic on the article talk page. Prhartcom (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

(unnamed section)

I did nothing wrong with to User talk:Yamaguchi先生 but he keeps on deleting my content on Wikipedia without telling me the reason. This is unfair. God will give me justice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohsin17 (talk • contribs)

You may have done nothing wrong to him, but your edits may have violated policy. I haven't checked your edits (except for one) so I'm not that sure. --TL22 (talk) 12:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Colour. You might have the courtesy to examine the consensus already there before inserting your personal preferences into the MOS. RexxS (talk) 03:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

@RexxS: I only removed the line ONCE, that is not edit warring. --TL22 (talk) 12:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
There's no minimum number of reverts needed to be edit-warring. The edit in question had already been the subject of an edit war and was under discussion on the talk page. There is now a clear consensus there that the guidance is appropriate, so your edit merely re-ignited the warring. Congratulations. Have a look at WP:AVOIDEDITWAR and see if you can avoid such errors in future. --RexxS (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Golden age of arcade video games

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Golden age of arcade video games you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 21:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, such as Reactions to the November 2015 Paris attacks, which you have recently edited. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. RGloucester — ☎ 21:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Informing people of TfDs

Hey ToonLucas22. Please see step III at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Listing a template. I just noticed that the discussion of {{Uw-paid1‎}} etc. had been closed at TfD as keep – without ever knowing they were up for deletion. I have over ten thousand pages on my watchlist and unfortunately missed these. I probably should clean that up a bit, but nevertheless, as the creator of the four templates, your first stop after nominating should have been my talk page, to notify me directly. I am annoyed, even after the keep, that I did not get to participate. Following the notification step will also keep people from later using that as a subsequent basis to overturn the discussion. I can tell you that had this resulted in deletion, I would be composing my deletion review nomination right now. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: BOI bias

Not at all man. No bias at all. Its just to keep uniformity. Otherwise Kick ww gross acc to koimoi HNY acc to some other shi*** website. How can we compare if we dont use same source? WikiBriefed (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Golden age of arcade video games

The article Golden age of arcade video games you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Golden age of arcade video games for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 18:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

List notability

As a note, you tagged List of Project CARS DLC for a PROD with the reasoning of "Blatant violations of WP:VGSCOPE and indiscriminate information. Lists must be notable on their own to be stand-alone lists." VGSCOPE may be an issue (lists of cars featured in racing games tends to get that way), but I will point out that the last part, about notability of lists, is not true. Per WP:LISTN, we like lists to have their standalone notability, but there is no consensus for other types of lists, such as one that requires gathering data from multiple RSes to build out. I am not saying that the PROD of that list is right or not, but I only saw that as the user that created the page is now reactionary-spamming tons of other DLC lists that have already been confirmed okay with the exact same reasoning. --MASEM (t) 20:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Golden age of arcade video games

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} The article Golden age of arcade video games you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Golden age of arcade video games for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

(unnamed section)

why u did this i edited where are ü now cause obviously the singer isnt ellen degeneres its justin bieber someone made fun of him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:58:AC05:9101:C9DE:1D61:7A0A:26D6 (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Agar.io

I'm sure that the information I added about the experimental game mode is accurate - I had three citations. I'd just like to know why it was reverted. Thanks, Aryamanaroratalk, contribs 14:30, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, ToonLucas22!

Happy New Year!

ToonLucas22,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 23:55, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Thanks! Something funny is that it's still 31 of December in my country as of the time I'm writting this, though. --TL22 (talk) 01:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Userspace circular redirects

A page in your userspace, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Userspace circular redirects and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Userspace circular redirects during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 18:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Letcreate123,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ToonLucas22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your revert on the Anzac-class frigate article on 10:28, 20 March 2015‎

Stdawe (talk) 10:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

I noted that a change that was made earlier the same day, probably by myself (novice user, forgot to log in) was reverted by you as factually incorrect. The change was to indicate that the 9LV products provided to the Anzac class are by Saab, not by CelsiusTech. All of Celsius was acquired by Saab 1999/2000, including CelsiusTech and the 9LV product. References are available on the Saab Group page as well as on the 9LV page itself.

I was attempting to make the article up to date, and it's my impression that the updated text is more relevant (as Saab is the current supplier to RAN) than the old (that CelsiusTech was the supplier before 2000).

Please advice, preferably with a reference to Wikipedia policy (as I am a novice user). Perhaps the wording should be "Saab (former CelsiusTech)"?

@Stdawe: I had no idea about the thing. But you probably shouldn't be discussing over an edit that happened over a year and half ago. Feel free to re-do the change if you need to, though. --TL22 (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Morgz

Hi there, although I agree that Morgz is likely a candidate for speedy deletion, I did want to mention that tagging an article moments after creation is a bit bitey and doesn't really assume good faith. This, of course, doesn't apply to things like vandalism or attack pages, but generally giving a new user 10+ minutes is a good rule of thumb. —Non-Dropframe talk 20:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Ah, my apologies. It's been some time since I last used Huggle so I kind of forgot that. Thanks for the reminder, by the way. --TL22 (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Rejected link on Madness and the Minotaur page

Toon,

I got your message on my posted link on the Madness and the Minotaur page.

I have read the link guidelines that you hooked me up to but it wasn't clear if or if not my link should be posted, and/or where. Should I post it in the External Links section? Or not at all?

I ran across this valuable(?) link in a boredom induced stupor longing for the 'good ol' days' when 32k RAM was a sparkling addition to the 'newest 1981 tech' available. This emulator is a wonderful tool for reminiscing about and using the Tandy Color Computer®.

Also the External Link posted "Play Madness and the Minotaur on-line" is no longer active. Can this be replaced with the link I offered?

Thanks for you time and all that you do for us.

A donating member, Dynan3 (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Dynan3

February 2017

Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Despina Papadopoulos because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. TL22 (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Why did you think they were inappropriate? I am not sure I understand - this was an NGO funded project with great impact. Can you please explain- thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dp dean ny (talk • contribs) 22:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

@Dp dean ny: The problem is that external links should rarely be used in prose, if at all. If you believe the page would still benefit from that external link, feel free to add it to the External links section of the page. If you still have questions, I'd suggest reading WP:EL. --TL22 (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you - I am new to editing so this was helpful! thanks again, will keep in mind. I will add it as an external reference. dp_dean_ny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dp dean ny (talk • contribs) 22:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

(untitled section)

Hey, sorry about earlier. I hope this makes up for our previous dispute.

I actually really like Minecraft. Do you have any social media I can follow? I would really like to get to know you better.

Email me at cuty8907@yahoo,com :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historyluver69 (talk • contribs)

@Historyluver69: I have no intentions of sharing my social media, but feel free to read Wikipedia's guide for beginners. See you around. --TL22 (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey

Yo, what's up? Nathan Koata (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Trump

I closed the RM. Chris H of New York (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Stop Please stop edit warring. I am not edit warring, just upholding a decision but I will cease stooping to your level and will not edit that page for now. Do not take advantage of this or that shows a lack of character and ethics on your part. Chris H of New York (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

edits to deferred action for childhood arrivals wikipedia page

my edits are only increasing the accuracy of the page by using the legally accepted term "illegal immigrant" therefore should in no way be considered vandalism. however politically incorrect it may be at the moment it is more accurate a definition, I also feel it is important that wikipedia not appear to have a political agenda and thus maintain it's credibility....thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C505:7D20:E85E:A142:29E4:90B6 (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC) ....http://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/sorry-the-accurate-legal-term-illegal-alien

Help

Do you minis helping with Draft:List of highest-grossing animated films in Canada and the United States82.38.157.176 (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

can I help please (you did read the comment "If declining please be a bit more description about what I need to do and maybe help out. As the other have not be that useful" did u 82.38.157.176 (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Opium Wars

You are simply incorrect. I am sorry if it offends you that the point of the Opium Wars was was to sell British opium, but that was the main reason for them and for that matter why they are called 'Opium' Wars.

Sorry (Really belated)

I don't know if you remember, when you removed part of Geometry Dash I was really annoyed, I think i even harassed you and Widr, so sorry xD. --DashyGames (talk) 07:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC) (it was with my old account so you probably don't recognize me)

Happy Wikifools 2017!

Wikifool mastah
i need to sleep, please save the joke AfDs from deletion by CSD G3 when i am not present. thanks. oh, and WikiLove and stuff. DiamondMiner7OnWHEELz!april fools!ProDuct0339 14:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Sora (video game) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sora (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sora (video game)

Hello, ToonLucas22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 17:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ToonLucas22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

DJ Q

Hello hope you are well.

You have notified me that I have added incorrect information to DJ Q's Wikipedia page. Wikipedia incorrectly stated that his real name was Paul Flynn which upon searching the internet there was nothing to confirm that - he is a seperate DJ Q to the wikipedia page I edited.

Proof that DJ Q's real name is Shollen Quarshie was already in the citations so I'm unsure as to why you removed my edit.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.104.240 (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

That Chinese word

Toon, I don't think you realize what is being sourced by user-generatied content. That link to urban dictionary exists in the article, because it is being used as a source for the statement "Soon, the word was inscribed on Urban Dictionary " Now, I am not that profficient with Wiki rules, so I can't link you the precise rule that regulates situations like this, but I've seen user-generated content being used and approved by admins in situations like this a few times, and even the basic logics confirms that this obviously should be allowed here. Karl.i.biased (talk) 02:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

As I said in your talk page, the information is completely irrelevant if there is no significant coverage from secondary, reliable sources for it. --TL22 (talk) 02:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
And since both of you are at three reverts each, I trust this matter will continue at talk pages (although the article talk would be preferred) and not on the article proper. —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

DJ Q update (still not vandalism?)

My edits are not vandalism. "Paul Flynn" is a seperate DJ Q. He is not the subject of the wikipedia article DJ Q.

DJ Q's real name is Shollen Quarshie. The references/citations 1 and 2 both state that his name is Shollen Quarshie and there is no mention of him being Paul Flynn.

If anything the "vandalism" is whoever edited it to say "Paul Flynn", though if you could kindly explain to me how I am "vandalising" it by adding correct information cited in those references then I'd be very grateful.

Kind regards

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2.24.104.240

I was mistaken there, sorry. The edit just popped up on Huggle and I assumed you were adding erroneous information. Feel free to revert to the previous revision if necessary though. --TL22 (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_e4LgHOEjkQ48XE9&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ToonLucas22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Letcreate123/Archive_2&oldid=1185590915"