User talk:Lesbianadvocate

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Lesbianadvocate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Regancy42 (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited University of Phoenix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Higher Education Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 31, 2012

The following message is an advisory, it is not a warning. You are not being punished, ridiculed, or derided. Please continue all helpful editing practices, cheers!

Hello Lesbianadvocate. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamaUtil (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heidi Heitkamp, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Medicare and Social Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shelley Adler, née ?

I see that you've just done considerable work on Shelley Adler. I've been doing some work on it myself, trying to arrange things in a more chronological order and NPOV'ing things.

Have you been able to find a source with Adler's birth name? I assume that she changed her name when she married John Adler; but I haven't been able to find the names of her parents. Hope that you've got better sources than I can find. Ammodramus (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying hard to find info on Adler but there just aren't many sources.Lesbianadvocate (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same trouble. I was also trying to find dates for the early-life section: birth date, dates of graduations, dates of clerkship, date of marriage, etc. No luck at all. Good luck-- Ammodramus (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Lesbianadvocate! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tammy Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob La Follette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you leave Cheri alone...

"Lesbian Advocate,"

I don't know if you work for a conservative PAC or the RNCC, but you clearly spend hours per day (paid, I would hope!) editing wiki articles to either make Republicans look better, or Democrats look worse. Some job -- sad, really. I attend college, and our computer labs are open, each computer with its own ISP address I believe. Either way, there is no way you can block me from using them to revert your edits. I will just keep creating new wiki accounts from new gmail accounts (takes 2 mins). Either leave Cheri's page alone, or expect this war to continue! :)

I am not a paid staffer for anyone. I'm a college student and a strong Cheri supporter. Schilling supporters have been so juvenile and childish -- egging her office (google it if you don't believe me -- hey, and then add it to her page!!) and screaming obscenities late at night as they drive by her headquarters -- all documented. They have also sent trackers being super aggressive to the point of insanity. Shoving cameras in her face and the faces of her staffers asking about partial birth abortions. I know it's not fair to you, but this little wiki war fun I'm having is just my way of standing up to Schilling. I realize you work for a national org., prob. in D.C., and are not directly affiliated w/ Schilling.... but.... wrong place, wrong time I guess.

You can do anything you want to Cheri's wiki page after the election, but until then, I'm not going to have even one person in congressional district 17 log on and read about how Catholic bishops are against her and how she is forcing Catholic hospitals to provide contraception. The way it was phrased on her page was a distortion. By election day, there will have been 3 televised debates in our district, as well as numerous newspaper articles summarizing her positions and Schilling's positions, so there is plenty of information out there for even the lowest information voter to latch onto in order to make a reasonably informed decision. I do not have any control over paid or earned media, but I *do* have some control over her wiki page, and I'd rather keep it issue-free than risk even ONE voter being given skewed, biased, partisan, or in any way editorial information about issues central (or NOT central, as the case may be) to this election. I realize your information is sourced, but it's not just that an issue is sourced or not -- that is not the concern -- it's which particular issues you are choosing to cover that is biased, and how they are presented.

If you can figure a way to find out which college I am at, and have all the computer lab computers banned from wiki, then you can stop me.... otherwise, you'll just have to deal with it.

P.S. Your handle is what really has motivated to stop you, because it's intentionally and inherently MISLEADING!! You are not a lesbian (unless you are Dick Cheney's daughter, perhaps....in any case, certainly you are no lesbian *advocate*). Your handle actually nicely exemplifies the work you are doing on wiki. Norlns22 (talk)

ANI discussion

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit warring, POV pushing over several pages. User:Norlns22. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 20:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lesbianadvocate

I don't know what you mean by sock puppetry. Then again, I'm not being paid by a Conservative PAC or the NRCC to sit on a computer all day and think up edits to make Democratic candidates appear in the worst light possible. I feel sorry for you and your life in its current existence/ version. Maybe you should try grad school?? Nationalavenue (talk)

P.S. Cheri Bustos is up by 4 points.

Threats, vandalizing articles, edit warring, and sock puppetry will get you blocked. And I have nothing to do with any interested party. I live in Hong Kong for God's sake. Lesbianadvocate (talk) 09:26, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Curious you appear to have literally stopped editing right after the U.S. election ended. Indigowild (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheri Bustos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Head Start (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:21, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linda McMahon

Hi!

I have responded to your edits on Linda McMahon.

--Screwball23 talk 19:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC) P.S. I do apologize, I did not visit your userpage, and addressed yourself as either he/she in my response there.[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Lesbianadvocate! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Shimkus has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:24, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle McCarter

Hello, I am writing to you about your recent edits to Kyle McCarter. Many of your edits violate WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE, and you add long paragraphs about relatively irrelevant topics to this article, such as the minor Mercy Ministries controversy in Australia, or going into detail about his daughters death or about a seemingly minor campaign finance controversy. Would you please stop inserting such irrelevant and potentially harmful and biased material into this article? Thanks. --1990'sguy (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All of my contributions conform to Wikipedia policy. The campaign finance is due in particular is not minor. Indeed it has drawn a lot of media coverage. Lesbianadvocate (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I left a paragraph about that important issue. We should not remove it entirely. However, I do think that it is improper to add two or three long paragraphs about this issue, especially since McCarter is currently involved in a congressional campaign.

But besides the campaign finance issue, why did you add an entire paragraph detailing the death of McCarter's daughter? This article is supposed to be about Kyle McCarter, not about his daughter. If people really want to know more about his daughter and her death, they can look at the citations that we added.

Also, why did you add an entire paragraph detailing why Mercy Ministries is controversial in Australia? This is entirely irrelevant to the article, and it seems like a POV edit against McCarter. Why do you want to add this material, while removing material about McCarter's support for Each1Feed1? Overall, your edits seem like POV edits against a politician currently running for higher office.

I saw your edits for John Shimkus, and from what I saw, you did a really good job improving the quality of the article and removing POV, undue weight material. So, why are you adding what appears to be undue weight, POV material in Kyle McCarter? It really does seem like you are holding double standards, especially since Shimkus and McCarter are currently running against each other. Thanks. --1990'sguy (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I politely ask you not to revert my edits until we can talk this out and come to some agreement. Thanks. --1990'sguy (talk) 14:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are asking me to give you a blank check to vandalize the article. And vandalism is in fact what you are doing. You know very well this material is not improper.Lesbianadvocate (talk) 15:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Council for Capital Formation

Your edits were mentioned here

LA, your edit were mentioned over here . I took a look at the edits, and without sources, they have to remain out, per BLP. Sorry. KoshVorlon 16:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EllenMcGill (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The report is now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lesbianadvocate reported by User:EllenMcGill (Result: ). You can respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EllenMcGill (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, they made me move the discussion again. -- EllenMcGill (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amazingly, it's been moved one more time, to WP:COI/N. EllenMcGill (talk) 15:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Account by digital PR firm FP1 Strategies masquerading as legitimate editor. You can respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest; Terms of Use

Hi Lesbianadvocate. I work on COI issues a great deal in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing.

I want to make sure you are aware of three things, and ask you to reply.

First I am starting to look carefully at your editing history, and there are some legs to the claims being made at COIN, based on your editing.
Second, I want to make sure you are aware of the policy on paid editing.
If you are not aware of the history of paid editing scandals in Wikipedia, which have brought into disrepute entities that have done them, and which actually drove the amendment of the Terms of Use by the board of the Wikimedia Foundation and the creation of the PAID policy, please see Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia; if you are not aware of it you might also want to read WP:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms.

I am sorry to say but the situation looks pretty bad for you, on the grounds of what appear to be long-term violations of NPOV alone, much less the possible PAID/COI issues; the evidence presented at COIN is already enough that some admins would indef you per PAID. You have been unresponsive when these issues have been raised in the past, per prior threads on this page, to which you do not seem to have responded. I suggest that you reply at COIN and if (if) you are working with FP1 that you disclose that and make some kind of offer. Jytdog (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lesbianadvocate, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Brianhe (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lesbianadvocate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lesbianadvocate, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Airlines for America's official logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Airlines for America's official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]