User talk:Leroyjoenoes

This user is a student editor in UCLA/Molecular_Biotechnology_(Fall_quarter) .

Welcome!

Hello, Leroyjoenoes, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Screen Shot 2021-10-11 at 1.24.27 PM.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Screen Shot 2021-10-11 at 1.24.27 PM.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vaccinology have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vaccinology was changed by Leroyjoenoes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944471 on 2021-10-18T21:14:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leroyjoenoes! Your additions to Vaccinology have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ASUKITE 14:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaccinology (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaccinology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vaccinology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leroyjoenoes! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vaccinology has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vaccinology. Thanks! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leroyjoenoes, I would like to also let you know that this version of your article should not be moved into the main space until it is properly reviewed to meet the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. I have listed the primary issues on your draft. If you are having difficulties understanding the issues I would recommend you reach out to your instructor or one of your Wiki Ed advisors User:Ian (Wiki Ed) or User:Helaine (Wiki Ed). If you continue to push your article, in the current state, could lead to a lose of editing privileges as someone could consider it disruptive. I would not like to see this happen, so I would recommend you get some assistance and work on improving the draft at Draft:Vaccinology‎‎ until someone more familiar with the policies approves it. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaccinology (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Vaccine. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is covered in the vaccine article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vaccinology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vaccinology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues

Your additions to the Draft:Vaccinology article include passages copied verbatim from a non-free source. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. For copyright reasons, your entire contribution was deleted. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vaccinology (November 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This topic is covered adequately by Vaccine. There have been tendentious efforts first to expand vaccinology into an article, which have been correctly cut back down to a redirect, so that vaccinology has now been protected. The continuing submission of this draft as a further effort to create a separate article is also tendentious.

Do not resubmit this draft or any similar draft. If this draft is resubmitted, a request will be made at WP:ANI for a topic-ban or partial block.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Just completed your peer review, Leroy! Good job! (Chevyjm (talk) 08:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Your draft

Hi. I returned your draft to your sandbox. It's now back at User:Leroyjoenoes/Vaccinology

As people have said in response to your AFC draft, this is not a viable stand-alone article because it duplicates what's covered in the vaccine article. Instead of creating something new, you should work on improving that article.

In addition, the tone of your writing isn't appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia has a distinct style, and you need to stick to it. Articles begin with lead sections that usually take the form Article title is... and then goes on to succinctly state what the subject is. Most people are never going to read past the first sentence, so the goal is to supply them with the most important information right away. Most of the readers who read past that aren't going to read beyond the lead, so once again, the lead should summarize all the important information. (The majority of people aren't even going to see this on Wikipedia, they're going to see it as Google's knowledge panel on the right of the page on a Google search.)

Wikipedia articles never speak directly to their readers. Saying something like This page will cover... just isn't done. You also need to avoid opinions and filler like Vaccines take use of the amazing capacity of the highly evolved human immune system. Amazement is a reaction, a response, not a fact. "Highly evolved" is filler - everything is equally highly evolved because every living thing is equidistant from our common ancestor. (And vaccines are used for plenty of non-human organisms, so "human" immune system is incorrect.

Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vaccinology

Hello, Leroyjoenoes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vaccinology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vaccinology

Hello, Leroyjoenoes. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vaccinology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]