User talk:Leptonsandquarks

Welcome!

Hello, Leptonsandquarks, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. This is just a class project, but I am having enough fun that I think I will continue after this is done! Everyone has been so welcoming! Your suggestions are appreciated. Leptonsandquarks (talk) 08:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I have help in linking to a subsection. I know that to link to a main entry I use entry_name. If that entry has a subsection called "section_name," what format do I use to link to that? Thank you. Leptonsandquarks (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand your question, you are referring to "deep linking" to a section in another Wikipedia article? In that case, use a hashtag after the article name, followed by the section name. See Section links. One more tip: to get the attention of another user, you can use one of the templates at Mentions, especially if you are asking a question on your own talk page or in a discussion elsewhere on an article's talk page. Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ILC

Did you have some other article in mind here? What you used as reference isn't a source for the added text at all. --mfb (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are right -- I pasted in the wrong reference. I have fixed it now. Thank you for your help.

I am sorry, I am new at this. Leptonsandquarks (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snowmass Process (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only primary (and mostly close) sources cited, therefore notability not established.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snowmass Process and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snowmass Process, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leptonsandquarks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your notes! This is my first article (I have been editing but have not created an article yet) and I appreciate your help. I understand the point you were making and agree. I have improved it by adding outside references to articles in Symmetry Magazine, CERN Courier, Science and Scientific American that all mention the Snowmass Process. I hope this addresses the problem. I have resubmitted it if you have the time to look at it again. I accidentally resubmitted it with a typo in a reference, but I can fix that if it gets accepted. Leptonsandquarks (talk) 01:50, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Snowmass Process has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Snowmas Process diff 1084683033. Thanks! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snowmass Process has been accepted

Snowmass Process, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 23:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This is very exciting! Leptonsandquarks (talk) 00:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Higgs factory has been accepted

Higgs factory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!Leptonsandquarks (talk) Leptonsandquarks (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Importance rating for DUNE

I'm less clear about the Importance scale, but I believe it's at leas mid-importance. Take a look at the Importance scale for experiments, and make the case for a higher rating... Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it ranks highly on the importance scale because it was the highest priority project in Particle Physics according to a 2014 community review called P5. It is also appearing in BBC News, NBC news and so forth, as can be seen from the references. I will add text on its importance tomorrow! Thank you! Leptonsandquarks (talk) 22:00, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]