Jump to content

User talk:Leocelis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Ohstudio (talkcontribsblock logcreation log).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. FisherQueen (Talk) 16:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leocelis (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi!, I make the mistake of create a incomplete article call BeDesk, however when I was editing again to complete the article, wikipedia block me, I try to post the complete article with th account ohstudio, and now with this, and I can't. It's about a web operating system like Desktoptwo, I want to post in the Web operating system article the link to my article BeDesk, now complete, but I can't edit anything. Please unblock me so I can post the complete article about my web operating system called BeDesk, thanks a lot!

Decline reason:

Confirmed abusive sockpuppet of blocked editor, created by your own admission to get around a block. Additionally, our conflict of interest guidelines (WP:COI) strongly discourage you from creating an article about this product as you are clearly directly involved. In any case, only your sockpuppeteer account, the parent account, is eligible for unblock consideration. — Yamla 16:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin

[edit]

This user created an article, BeDesk, about a product that does not meet the notability guidelines, using his User:Ohstudio account. He recreated it twice, ignoring the usual warning templates. When I blocked him for a week for persistent recreation, he created this sockpuppet account to recreate this article. This account is the sockpuppet; if you decide to unblock this user before his week is up, the correct account is at User:Ohstudio. In my opinion, this account should stay blocked, since he doesn't need two accounts. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leocelis (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi again. I understand your reasons. Two things: first, I wan to use this account, and I want to unregister ohstudio. About the BeDesk articule, I made the mistake of the persistent recreation, but I have that article complete now and I thing that I've the same rights of Desktoptwo for example, to put my article about my web operating system, and linked to the Web Operating System topic. I have the article complete now, and I think that mane people will be interested in BeDesk, and I think that deserved to figure in the topic that I just mencioned. Thanks a lot guys, please unblock this account, if it's possible unregister ohstudio

Decline reason:

No, you really don't get it. You have no "rights" to put "your article" about "your web operating system". In fact, almost anyone else would have that right, but you don't get to write about yourself or your operating system; there are several different Wikipedia policies preventing exactly that. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 01:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leocelis (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You are kiding me??? Please see this entry: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Web_operating_system, and now see this: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/DesktopTwo, MY ARTICLE IS EXACTLY LIKE THIS!, it's a web desktop, like Desktop Two. So I believe in Wikipedia, and write a article about my web desktop, and put in the web operating system topic. I think that ANYONE can write about his web desktop like Desktoptwo, manye other, AND ME, and put in the reference of the web operating system topic. So, if my article is similar to Desktoptwo, I've a web app like them, and I want to put in the web opearting system topic, what I don't have rights? Please tell me, who are your administrator? I need to talk to somebody who understand this situacion I have the autority to correct this.

Decline reason:

No, we are not kidding you. We are not your advertising service. To collude the two examples you mentioned is akin to comparing apples in general and a specific, newly created variety of apple-looking peach. And also, do not demand rights that do not exist. You have absolutely no authority to demand us to do anything. To be a "free encyclopedia" does not mean to be an anarchic one. If you are demanding such out of ignorance of our policies, then that is forgivable, but your continued recalcitrance in the face of blunt explanations is not tolerated. This is already your third unblock request (two more than permitted), and hence your talk page has been protected. — Kurykh 04:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.