User talk:Legends2016

Yasmin Bokhari is on wikapedia mwh has also mentioned riaz ali shah. @JamesBWatson

hi. this is Legends2016. please contact me on my email my article is authentic and the personality is very famous. i have cited the sveral sources and can scan them to you in orignal. there is a road in honor of this person in pakistan (http://nearbypk.com/maintenance-and-repair/all/31.508839/74.353615/riaz-ali-shah-rd-lahore-pakistan). third parties have written about him in his relation to tb and jinnah. also, the stuff written is re written from the articles and the links mentioned on the page such as the Rockfeller foundation etc can be contacted. none of it has been my opinion. i mentioned sitare- khidmat pakistan . the govt of pakistan can be contacted and i have a copy of the award.independant sources are mentioned plus also the web site which mentions the videos of the leaders actually shows footage of the leaders so you can verify it. i also did not use the sources which i will mention now but i simply typed his name and found web sites discussing him which have nothing to do with him but pakistan history- http://twicsy.com/i/B8QZvi and http://www.mayohospital.gop.pk/chestmedicine.php http://rajputdata.com/staging/ http://nation.com.pk/lahore/25-Mar-2012/face-tb-head-on-urge-experts (the Nation is largest newpaper of pakistan) http://www.social-peek.com/Keywords/a.sheikh there are more web sites but these are a few..he was a bridge between the west and pakistan. thanks buddy..

May 2016

Hello, "Legends2016", and welcome to editing Wikipedia. I hope you have a successful time contributing here. I thought it might help to give you a few words of advice. Wikipedia seek to present information from a neutral point of view, but some parts of the draft you are working on gives the impression that it is written from the point of view of someone who regards Riaz Ali Shah as a wonderful person, whom we should all admire. Assuming that your intention is to eventually post it as an article, I suggest you re-read it and consider writing it in a less laudatory tone, as otherwise it is likely to be at least heavily edited to remove promotional content, and possibly even deleted. Also, while you do give references to a couple of sources, much of what you have written is just stated, without any source being provided. It is important to have sources which are independent of the subject to establish notability. "Independent of the subject" means that things written by him, or written or published by people or organisations he has worked with, are not suitable. By that I don't mean that such sources should not be used as references, as they can be very useful for verification of information, but they are not useful for establishing notability. I am confident that he is notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article, but you should provide evidence to show that he is. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riaz Ali Shah (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Onel5969 : please discuss refrences with me/

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, no indication of notability in the current references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Riaz Ali Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Legends2016, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Legends2016! I'm Wiae. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wiae /tlk 19:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Riaz Ali Shah

Hello, Legends2016. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Riaz Ali Shah".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]