User talk:Legallawyer2

August 2024

Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Promissory note have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Deleting the prior warnings from your user talk page does not absolve you of the need to heed such warnings. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: in addition to the WP:REFSPAM problem, the Lawrina site does not qualify as a reliable source. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Valereee (talk) 15:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing about the block on my account. I think this block is unfair and want to explain why.

First, I am not engaged in any promotion of the company you mentioned. I am a law school graduate who has utilized this company's services and information over the years. If necessary, I can provide evidence such as invoices from many years ago.

The reason I mentioned the company in my edits is because I have recently written a paper on the state of the modern legal world and legal tech. During my months-long analysis, I discovered many companies that provide legal assistance in a modern and progressive style.v

Also, I am currently in professional practice, during which I am required to deal with Wikipedia pages on various topics. I see it as my professional duty to supplement these pages with information that can really help someone in a difficult situation.

I am outraged that there are editors who limit my ability to improve Wikipedia; I thought this space was being improved through collective efforts.

This feels more like harassment than rational and lawful actions.

I hope you come to the right decision. 83.49.230.95 (talk) 09:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Legallawyer2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello! I want to file an appeal against the blocking because it restricts my rights, and the reason stated for the ban is not true. I am not engaged in the promotion of the company you mentioned here. I am a graduate of a law school who has used the services and information of the company I edited. If necessary, I can provide evidence, such as invoices from many years ago. Why do I mention the company in the text? I wrote a paper on the state of the modern legal world and legal tech. During my months-long analysis, I discovered many companies that provide legal assistance in a modern and progressive style. Also, I am currently in professional practice, during which I am required to deal with Wikipedia pages on various topics. I see it as my professional duty to supplement these pages with information that can really help someone in a difficult situation. I am outraged that there are editors who limit my ability to improve Wikipedia; I thought this space was being improved through collective efforts. I will await the unblocking, as I am currently deeply concerned about the behavior of certain editors. This seems more like harassment than logical and lawful actions. I hope you come to the right decision. Legallawyer2 (talk) 09:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether you work for the company or merely used its services, you were promoting it. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information, it is for summarizing independent reliable sources. Wanting to help people is a noble goal, but that is best accomplished on your own website or social media. You have no rights on this privately operated website,(this is not a free speech forum, but a project to write an encyclopedia) nor does it violate the law for this website to decide you cannot use some of its services(like permitting you to edit). I suggest that you read WP:EXPERT. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.