User talk:Legaiaflame

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add content or change numbers without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to AK-107 and other articles. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the articles. Thank you. ROG5728 (talk) 04:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Huns. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 02:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Hungary does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 02:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dog Soldiers (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Sabre, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Service pistol

added a link pointing to Sidearm

Sidearm (weapon)

added a link pointing to Sheath

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Service pistol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidearm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ruger GP100

Please stop combining the 357 Magnum and 38 Special caliber models like you are in this article, it makes it sound like you are discussing one variant/model that is manufactured for both calibers. This is not the case, there are GP100s specifically manufactured in 357 magnum (which can optionally also chamber and fire 38 special, although they are not manufactured in that caliber) and some models that are manufactured to chamber only 38 (which can not chamber or fire 357). Just because most 357 magnum revolvers can also fire 38 special, does not mean they are "manufactured" or "chambered" in "357/38". Thank you, and happy editing. - Adolphus79 (talk) 07:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Waxwork (film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caracole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parthian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Legaiaflame! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Melee weapon

added a link pointing to Pike

Ranged weapon

added a link pointing to Elastic

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lancer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spearhead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm RandomCanadian. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Service rifle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Service rifle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Xennials, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 05:05, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you've never said anything on a talk page, or attempted to discuss your edits, and maybe that's more a result of us. People not directly talking to you like an actual person. I don't know for sure whether you'll pay attention to this, but I figured that I would say something. Just so you know, Wikipedia does require people to occasionally explain an edit, or respond to an inquiry. People who never do that are typically blocked, so it's in your best interest to say something, from time to time. Your edits to Xennials weren't at all unreasonable, by any means, but we need to have a source to back up what you said, and not just personal opinion. Otherwise it's WP:original research. If you respond, I'll see it here, but you're free to ask or say anything on my talk page as well. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 05:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Symmachus Auxiliarus: I know I'm necroposting, but I think the reason Legaiaflame has never used a talk page is because they edit with the Android app. Kleinpecan (talk) 14:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Browning Hi-Power, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 14:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SIG Sauer P227, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidearm.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smith & Wesson .38/44, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent unsourced additions

You appear to have a history of making unsourced edits. When you add or change content in an article, you should cite your changes to a reliable source to show that it is accurate. Changing information without explaining why you believe the previously written information was inaccurate, or without citing a source, is a form of subtle vandalism. You can consider this a final warning that if you continue to make unsourced and unexplained edits, you may be blocked. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preadolescence

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 15:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:45, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legaiaflame. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]