User talk:Leeroyhim

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leeroyhim, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Leeroyhim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Bandai supervision 8000

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bandai supervision 8000. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bandai Super Vision 8000. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bandai Super Vision 8000 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bisswajit 17:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Please, use your sandbox for article developments and create actual Wikipedia article when finishes. Also, you may use the article for creation process for your new articles. Thank you, --Bisswajit 17:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zone 3d

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Zone 3d requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

N64 reference URLs

It looks like it was totally unintentional, but whatever you are doing, you are breaking the URLs in the references. I don't know what's causing it, but just letting you know that's what has been going on with your edits, since you don't seem to realize it yet. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 22:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its probably the browser you are using to edit. Try another browser or something. « Ryūkotsusei » 22:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your edits are still breaking URLs. I suggest holding off editing for a bit and switching browsers, or playing with a sandbox to try to figure out what's wrong. I know you mean well but right now you are doing more harm than good by continuing to edit. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 01:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guilty Gear manuals

Yes, I am. It wiil be very helpful to source the gameplay section of the series games. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For now, the first one. As you can see in the article's history I've expanded Guilty Gear (video game) from this to its current status, aiming a GAN. However, I couldn't find sources to cover all the "Gameplay" section. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I will see if i can get that done later.Leeroyhim (talk) 23:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the Guilty Gear Isuka's one would be great too. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am having lag right now, if I don't post them later today I will try to send them to you DEFINITELY by tomorrow.

Ok. No hurry, man. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Philips CD-i, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

For your attention.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 03:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:44, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Communication Station

This user is a participant in WikiProject Telecommunications.

Might have to put this wikiproject on hold for another day or two.

Re

Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft already exists

Not sure if it's alive or not. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi. Essentially, we have many WikiProjects that treat or may treat Microsoft. What we really need is contributors. So, the second most redundant thing in the world is another WikiProject on Microsoft.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. There are no old dead ones. All said WikiProjects are active and its members are doing their best. It appears you don't even know how the current state of Wikipedia is. How are you supposed to fix it? Give me one reason as to why your new WikiProject is going to be a lot better than the others.

And please sign your messages by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Doing so certainly improves your chance of convincing people.

Best regards

Codename Lisa (talk) 09:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tandy Video Information System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tandy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Jakandsig (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leeroyhim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am no sockpuppet. A common post that is criticized is that I have referred to one edit as my version and people believe it is jakandsigs, except it is not. According to this source, Source 1, this was my edit, when Jak reverted here, Source 2, that was my edit and most likely he did not realize it was my edit he reverted to, why, because my change of the link to the source I changed before is STILL THERE (read: Latimes reference). Now I am not going to insult you personally for the block but it seems clear to me no actual investigation of actually checking was done. Other claims resulted in stretching, like issues remembering to sign, when i am a new account. This source that claimed I cited wikipedia. Source 3, yet Wikipedia is no where to be seen, proving to me, you or others did not read the sources that were clearly made up trying to claim I am a sock puppet. Again, I am not trying to insult you but it seems like sloppy job at best. Then 2 other sources compared me calling the Goldeneye article "bullshit' to jak making personal attacks to other users. How are those two related? They are not. Almost everything that was claimed was a stretch and nothing is true as you can see. I have to ask you what your actual procedure is for things like this because this is just not fair and terrible. How things like made up accusations and not even checking the reading material which is also what User:TheTimesAreAChanging, User:Indrian. User: Callanecc had done. along with you, is allowed here, especially for a claim of sockpuppetry. All of this is incorrect and sloppy based on the evidence above. Leeroyhim (talk) 16:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It appears that subsequent checks have confirmed a clear technical link between this account and Tigersuperman. Based on the behavior of the accounts involved, I see no reason to doubt that. Kuru (talk) 22:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Especially given the behavioual evidence, a "Likely" Checkuser result cannot be overturned without the help of a Checkuser. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "behavioual" evidence is mostly false when reading the sources to the actual claims. but i will let the real investigators see thatLeeroyhim (talk) 20:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing CU, FYI: [1]. Amalthea 18:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{Checkuser needed}} to review technical evidence. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Recent data makes the technical evidence even more convincing, and I will be commenting on the open SPI shortly. —DoRD (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looks like this is a pretty safe decline, but as the user named me in their unblock request (which is either because I blocked the master for personal attacks and edit warring or because I endorsed the request for CU on the SPI) I don't think it should be me to do it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]