User talk:Leedslad25

Brno

I'd reverted your edit. Being contestant in a TV product doesn't establish encyclopedical notability, especially when the mentioned TV product is commercian failure. Pavel Vozenilek 00:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Empty articles

Hi, I see you're creating empty articles, like Chris Casablanca, Bolek Polanski, and wow, tons of others. These are likely to be deleted at any time unless they get content put into them. What's the deal? Friday (talk) 21:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the process of adding content to them....

Thanks for contributing new articles, but some additional details would help. Making them a plain stub doesn't give wikipedians enough to improve on. See Wikipedia:Stub for info on more appropriate ones to use and Help:Starting_a_new_page to get you going. Would hate to see your work be deleted being mistaken as empty pages -- MrDolomite 21:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you're probably better off not starting the article until there's enough for it to be an actual article. Also, you might want to check out WP:BIO standards for biographies- just performing in obscure pornos isn't much of a qualification. Friday (talk) 21:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well... thanks for the concern but it will all be populated with info later. The articles were 'started' by virtue of them being added to the list. Easier to do the [[ ]] bit whilst adding. But your comments are noted.

Empty pages are a no no. That's why I have deleted those you created today. It is much better to create each page individually, and include at least a stub of the content you want to post. Moriori 22:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS is there any easier way of talking on wiki? Or is editing your own talk page how things are done?

That's pretty much it. Oh, and since you're new, here's a standard welcome-type message with some useful stuff in it:

Welcome!

Hello, Leedslad25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Friday (talk) 21:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK & thanks. I'm not that new, I'm just occasional so I forget stuff now and then. So thanks for the etiquette reminders but don't be concerned. Content is coming. Leedslad25 21:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:New MINI Cooper S.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:New MINI Cooper S.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Manilow_pina_colada_publicity_still.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Manilow_pina_colada_publicity_still.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 09:40, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dlapipernew.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dlapipernew.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Hansen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tommy Hansen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no real claim of notability, no sourcing, puffed up with nonencyclopedic commentary

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brandon Manilow

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Brandon Manilow. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Manilow. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brandon Manilow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Manilow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Manilow (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]