User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2020/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lee Vilenski. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi Lee - nice work as ever. I have left a couple of comments on the DYK nom page regarding a couple of tweaks; nearly ready for "ticking" though. Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 14:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- cheers, I'll take a look. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- All good now; I have marked as verified. Roll on the World Championship! Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 23:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William R. Pogue, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pilot, Gerald Carr and Ground control (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
No help just a comment
Thanks again for your help - if only all Wikipedians were as friendly and kind. Over the years the number of difficult or even nasty editors has really worn me down to the point of rarely wanting to do any editing even where it seems innocuous. I've had several encounters with prolific nastiness that I just feel more than ready to throw in the towel. Someone started editing over me today while I was fixing something and I sent a message asking them to "hold their horses" til I could finish the edits and they deleted it and added a very unpleasant revision note. Trying to do things right can feel utterly pointless. (As I said not the first bit of nasty I have encountered.) I'm going back to lurking now. Thanks again and thanks for all the help you consistently provide on help pages. --gobears87 (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
- ah gobears87, not everyone is on Wikipedia to assume WP:GOODFAITH. People get riled for all sorts of silly reasons. If you ever want to lessen the chances of an edit conflict, put the {{in use}} template on whilst you are completing a series of edits, and then other editors know you are updating an article.
If you get into an edit conflict, you don't lose your data and until you leave the page. If you scroll to the bottom, all of your edit is still there, so you can just copy it back into the revisioned version. In this way, you are better to not ask users to change their own edits, but rather follow WP:BRD if there is an issue with an item being added. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:04, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Sigh... including some admins it seems, Lee Vilenski which is pretty sad... thanks for the tip about the 'in use' template, though I did see it says "major edits" and I was doing minor stuff. The admin just had SO little patience that they started reverting me while I was sourcing something they TOLD ME to source (which was fine, long story). I asked pretty politely for time to finish on their talk page and boy did they jump down my throat. Then deleted what they said and apparently hid it? I see things in my watchlist I'd never seen before. More sighs. Anyway it can be such a war zone around here that I will avoid in future... I appreciate the time and kindness of so many of you though! --gobears87 (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, I think I found what you are talking about. I don't think the "Styles" section is particularly worth it's own section, we usually have post-nominals in the lede. Although an administrator deleting their own edit summaries is a bit beyond me. For what it's worth the tile Evelyn Sharp, Baroness Sharp should be changed for Evelyn Sharp (baroness) or similar. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- Slow to see this - yeah I don't think it was really that necessary but I didn't add it, and I thought the deletion seemed weirdly unnecessary. You're right about the title, but I decided I'm not going to monkey around with the stuff I don't know how to handle as well! Thanks again for your input & friendly manner! --gobears87 (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
2020 Masters (snooker)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 2020 Masters (snooker) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist great work as ever! Was a great event - now well written!
- As an aside, do you know if there is a script to check for double spaces in prose? I spotted you added one by accident, but it'd be a good tool if it existed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Sorry about the extra space! I am unaware of a script to check for this, but any extra spaces do not appear on screens when the article is being read by a WP user. You might leave a query at the Teahouse; they'll know if a tool exists. Cheers, Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 2020 Masters (snooker)
On 6 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 Masters (snooker), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the final of the 2020 Masters snooker tournament was interrupted by a "whoopee cushion" device? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 Masters (snooker). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 Masters (snooker)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 2020 European Masters
On 11 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 European Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Neil Robertson won the 2020 European Masters snooker tournament in a 9–0 whitewash, the first time since 1989 that a two-session finalist did not win a frame? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 European Masters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 European Masters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- test comment Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Shanghai Masters
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 Shanghai Masters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Shanghai Masters
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article 2019 Shanghai Masters you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 Shanghai Masters for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello Lee Vilenski/Archives/2020,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2019 Shanghai Masters
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article 2019 Shanghai Masters you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2019 Shanghai Masters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 2020 German Masters
On 14 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 German Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that even after losing at the 2020 German Masters snooker tournament, Sunny Akani continued to play on the practice tables at the venue for a further two days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 German Masters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 German Masters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
2020 European Masters
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 2020 European Masters has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 World Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2007 China Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1985 World Snooker Championship
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1985 World Snooker Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Lee – just one citation needed tag to resolve before I can mark as verified. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
2020 German Masters
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 2020 German Masters has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent work as ever Twofingered Typist. I do hope I am not overworking you with all these snooker articles! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Never! Appreciate your thanks. Cheers!Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- No worries. I expect I'll have a few more before the end of the season... That good topic won't write itself though! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Never! Appreciate your thanks. Cheers!Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Snooker Shoot Out, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Wells (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
2020 World Grand Prix copyedit
 | Hello, Lee Vilenski. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 2020 World Grand Prix at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Two of my edits were improperly rolled back. Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 01:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC) |
Discussion on the Draft namrespace
As a user who has expressed an interest in the Wikipedia:The future of NPP and AfC, you are invited to join a discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Rethinking_draft_space. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for 2020 World Grand Prix
On 28 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 World Grand Prix, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mark Williams won a snooker match at the 2020 World Grand Prix despite suffering from gout? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 World Grand Prix. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 World Grand Prix), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Wug·a·po·des 01:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks so much for the speedy GA review on 1980–81_Ipswich_Town_F.C._season. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 21:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC) |
- no problem Dweller. It was clearly a pretty decent article with some issues in the lede. I owe TRM for doing about 20 GANs of mine last year. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)