User talk:Lec CRP1

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello Lec CRP1, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips:

Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset.
Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page
Be bold
Ignore all rules

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, Alf 11:03, 30 August 2005 (UTC).[reply]

2005 USA-Race

DNS stands for when a car does not take a a race start. Makes sense. By having Ret listed that mean the driver has actually started in that race and will count a race starts towards the driver race start tally.. The formation lap does not count as a lap at all as it is not added towards the race classification. For when does a driver 'start' a Grand Prix? To my mind he does so only if he is on the grid when the flag drops or light goes green at the final start. Should a driver have failed to compete the formation lap, for instance (as was the case with Prost at Imola in 1991), he cannot truly be said to have started the race. In the case of restarted events such as the British GP in 1986, poor Jacques Laffite certainly did start the race, but this was declared null and void and he was not presented to take the restart, which is the only one that counts. For true official race results is best to get them off www.forix.com as they receive their race results from the officials. Yes I know formula1.com is official but not 100% official in statistics. If you decide to leave it as Ret then you must give all the drivers a race start count!

I have spend hours in researching and asking many F1 statistician who are famous and know more on Grand Prix. All the statisian I have contacted and got back told me it is actually DNS not Ret, they also have mention the formula1.com is not very accurate with their race results. The formula1.com is incorrect as listing as ret instead of DNS for 2005-USA. This were the responses from the following people. Renowned F1 statistians, like David Hayhoe or Autosport's Peter Higham agree that all Michelin drivers were DNS in 2005-USA, but consider a RET if a driver didn't made a re-start, for example. That was the common view in the past - no contemporary source listed Lauda as a DNS in 1976-Germany - and they simply ignore the current "null and void" FIA rule. I totally agree to change it as DNS not Ret as they didn't take part on the first lap.

Here is a intersting fact. Button will start his 100th race start in the 2005-China race. But according to wikipedia when doing the math by adding all Button race starts it would be his 101st race start in China as Button has been listed as Ret instead of DNS for this year 2005-USA race. Does this make sense to you. That means wikipedia will have an extra race start for all the drivers who have no started in the 2005 USA race have an extra race start which wouldn't be official to the drivers stats.

I am trying to help you all to have accurate data on Formula 1 on wikipedia. I DO beleive the formula1.com site doesn't not give out accurate race classifications. As I have been involved with FORIX and autosport.com for many years as my job is to look for incorrect data on their server. Andreas 04 October 09:36

No license.

Aloha! Whilst editing, I came across an article using Image:Martiniextradry.JPG, which you uploaded. You've stated that you created the image, but haven't specified a license. Unfortunately, Wikipedia requires that all images used in articles be either released under a free license or contain a fair-use rationale. If you're still around, could you edit the image to include a copyright tag usable in Wikipedia ({{GFDL}} etc). See WP:ICT for the full selection. If a license isn't supplied, the image may be deleted from Wikipedia. GeeJo _{(t) (c)} • 20:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

F1 portal featured article

The F1 portal (in which I assume you have some degree of interest, as your name is listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Formula_One) is intended to have a regular rotation of a 'featured article'. I've swapped a few in and out over the last couple of months, but I think it would be better if there were more of a community attempt at deciding this, proposals, votes, that kind of thing. So - why not pop over to Portal_talk:Formula_One#Suggestions_for_Featured_Article: and make a suggestion. Ta. 4u1e 00:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Selected articles on Portal:F1

Hello again.

I dropped notes round a while back to those who have listed themselves at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Formula_One to ask for suggestions for selected articles on portal:Formula One. There was a pretty good response, both in terms of how it might work and of articles suggested. Damon Hill came out with the most support and was brought up to Good Article standard after a lot of work by Skully Collins and others before going on as the F1 portal selected article a couple of weeks ago. It is now at Featured Article Candidates as a Featured Article candidate (why not drop by and see if you can help polish it further?).

Several people who responded to the original request suggested that a monthly or bi-weekly 'Selected Article' could act as a catalyst for an improvement drive to get more articles up to a higher standard. Although it wasn't quite what I had in mind when I started, this seemed to work pretty well for the Damon Hill article, so I've drafted up a process for doing this more regularly. See Portal_talk:Formula_One/Management_of_selected_articles for details. Essentially the suggestion is that we vote for an article to improve every couple of weeks and at the end of the improvement process the article goes on the portal as the new 'Selected Article'. I'd be grateful for any comments on how this might work - I'm sure some of you are more familiar with things 'Wiki' than me - as well as your votes for the next candidate (by 16 July).

You may also want to help with the article Gilles Villeneuve, which was the next most popular after Damon Hill. The idea is to try and get it up to GA standard by 16 July and then put it on the portal as the 'Selected Article'. I hope you can help! 4u1e 4u1e 16:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Schlesser mg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Schlesser mg.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Tim bigfoot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tim bigfoot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahnentafels

There's a slightly prettier template already for showing ancestry, take a look at George II of Great Britain to see if you like it. It's {{Ahnentafel4}}. - Nunh-huh 02:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Francois Desmier d'Olbreuse

Louis Desmier d'Olbreuse

Helene Renee Dorin

Alexandre Desmier d'Olbreuse

Jacques de Mathefelon

Jeanne de Mathefelon

Luce du Courret

Alexander II d'Olbreuse

Guillemette de Biron-Montferrand

Eleonore d'Esmier d'Olbreuse

Rene Poussard

Jean Poussard

Jacqueline de Barbizieres

Jacquette Poussard de Vendre

?

Jacqueline Dumas de L'Isle

?

Hey Lec CRP, I work on succession boxes on Wikipedia (the boxes at the bottom of all monarch pages are based off of a template I created) and have been wanting to implement a genealogical Ahnentafel report for quite a while. I saw the one you have been placing up on the Spanish royals page and I find things I like and dislike about it. The number one thing I like is that it is very simple and compact. It is not as rough as the one above and it is all in one big infobox. That being said, I think three generations is too much. I have created an infobox using your template and mixed it with the succession box format. You can view it at the bottom of Alfonso XIII of Spain. The only reason I am using that page is because it is where I first encountered your template.

The other problem is that it only tells half the story. I am trying to implement a feature in the infobox that allows a user to name the royal dynasties that contributed to the individual. For Alfonso XIII I have two Borbons and two Habsburg-Lorraines. However, if I have four columns, I can't bridge it to the succession box above it. That is something I am actively trying to fix, but it is not working well.

Finally, I think that placing the ancestry in the middle of the page may not be the best technique. Those infoboxes you are making are big and detailed and I think they take up too much space. I removed the headers for my template (Father, Mother, Great Grandmother, etc.) because I don't find them necessary, but once more, three generations I think takes too much space. If you know infobox format (which it seems you do), I would much like to work on something that could be anchored to the bottom of succession boxes, or freeformed when there is no succession box (for non-title holding royals). I am also working on a way to source all of these (succession boxes, infoboxes, etc.). Hopefully it will all work out in the end.
–Whale y land ( Talk • Contributions ) 23:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to add that the template I am working on is Template:s-fam and as of now it is an independent template (does not need s-start or end).
–Whale y land ( Talk • Contributions )

Zita of Bourbon Parma

You have done a great job with Empress Zita's article. I have respectfully tried to improve it even further. Hopefully it would be a WP:GA. Keep the good work. Miguelemejia 0:28, 22 July 2007

The review for GA is on the talk page of the article. Lara Love 20:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. It was promoted as GA. I have to say that I did not like the way the notes were left. Even features articles do not display them like that, my choice was better I think, but since was done by the one who rated the article so be it. I added rationale to the non free images that were removed and plan to put them back? what do you think ?

Miguelemejia 23 July 2007

TNF

Hi!

Thought I'd say hello because I'm Rob on TNF. I was reading the Wikipedia topic there and saw the mention of the F1 driver article assessment drive you were doing which I remembered from the F1 Wikiproject.

I spend most of my time dealing with the historic Grand Prix articles on here, so give me a shout if you need a hand with anything. I notice that the copying and pasting of information from websites is not limited to birth and death details - I found that a lot of the biographies of the pre-war drivers have been copied and pasted from websites, hence my attempt at a new Tazio Nuvolari article. Readro 15:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compliments for doing all of that F1 assessment work

That was really great of you. Thank you for being a good member of the F1 WikiProject; you are an asset, good sir. Guroadrunner 10:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colour of the ancestry templates

The greens are rather harsh and don't look particularly good. Could you use a different colour combination? Charles 07:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new colours are much softer and look so much better. Thanks! Charles 18:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Alexei Sayle & Johnnie Walker.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alexei Sayle & Johnnie Walker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Deiz talk 04:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lec, if you can appropriately work the image into the Alexei Sayle's Stuff article, give me a shout and I'll withdraw the nomination. As it doesn't link anywhere right now the image still fails WP:FU. Deiz talk 05:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me now :) Deiz talk 05:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mike spence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike spence.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wessex Children

Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, D B D 16:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link added from Assassination of Franz Ferdinand to Dragutin Dimitrievic

The article on Dragutin Dimitrievic contains serious factual errors and has no page citations. Would you mind me removing the link you just added from the assassination of Franz Ferdinand to Dragutin Dimitrievic until the article on Dimitrievic is cleaned up?Werchovsky (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:House of Habsburg after Ferdinand I (thinner version)

A tag has been placed on Template:House of Habsburg after Ferdinand I (thinner version) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ladybirds1970.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ladybirds1970.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue

Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in D B D 13:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Grandchildren of Victoria and Albert

I have nominated Category:Grandchildren of Victoria and Albert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wizardman 14:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Grandchildren of Paul I of Russia

I have nominated Category:Grandchildren of Paul I of Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wizardman 22:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Cricketers who committed suicide

Category:Cricketers who committed suicide, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 09:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:180px-MariaAnnun.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:180px-MariaAnnun.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 18:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Adalbertbavaria.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Adalbertbavaria.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 07:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time for resolution

Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! D B D 15:32, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zita of Bourbon-Parma

Hello, I've rated the article in the Austrian project. Regards,--Auslli (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My compliments

Greetings! I just wanted to compliment you on some great genealogy work, especially with your chart of Charles II of Spain. I can't say in words how much that particular chart has fascinated me, so instead, I will simply congratulate you for some work well done. Au revoir Ruby2010 (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Alexei Sayle & Johnnie Walker.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alexei Sayle & Johnnie Walker.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Cricketers who committed suicide

Category:Cricketers who committed suicide, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Gerry birrell.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gerry birrell.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bob todd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Bob todd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Schlesser.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Schlesser.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince paul of wurttemberg.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Prince paul of wurttemberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Blackhorsebar.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Blackhorsebar.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lec CRP1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mike spence.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mike spence.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lec CRP1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Exoskeleton3.jpg

The file File:Exoskeleton3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Friedrich michael.jpg

The file File:Friedrich michael.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ChristianIV-zw-bi.jpg

The file File:ChristianIV-zw-bi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fruit pastilles.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fruit pastilles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:House of Habsburg after Ferdinand I

Template:House of Habsburg after Ferdinand I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]