User talk:Learneggs12

Welcome

Hello Learneggs12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Learneggs12, good luck, and have fun. --Wyatt 915 ✍ 16:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brenden Foster, you will be blocked from editing. Specifically, the removal of sourced information is a no-no, and this sort of rude edit summary has no place in this community. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If your are an admin, and judge that I am a vandal, you should ban me. I don't think I've vandalized anything... I think I've actually improved the article if you aske me. Since I worked on the article quite a bit, I was criticizing my own work... Wikipedia is not censored for profanity, last time I checked. -Learneggs12 (talk) 18:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link you removed actually proved the point about the TV station starting a donation drive. I also note that you re-added the AfD which was legitimately closed. As far as profanity is concerned, you should consider Wikipedia:Civility. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link was asking for more money and did not elaborate at all on the drive. In fact I learned nothing about the drive. The AFD was closed after several hours, no comments by the same person who closed the last afd. Please, I'd like to see an admin do this after several days of commenting. Thanks. --Learneggs12 (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict--2nd time, Hammer!) Then take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review, where I wish you good luck. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenden Foster (4th nomination)

Please don't reopen afds after they've been closed. If you disagree with the closure, please go to Wikipedia:Deletion review instead. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 18:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have accepted your revert of my article, I only replaced the AFD tag since the tag specifically states that it should be kept up until all issues are resolved. I invite an Administrator to review all edits and ban me if appropriate. Again, I have no intention of vandalizing the encyclopedia --Learneggs12 (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are being highly disruptive just the same. I already offered an alternative and you're refusing. The article was just kept in two afds less than a month ago. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 19:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have only added an AFD. If adding an AFD is disruptive, then I suppose I have been disruptive. The two previous AFDs were not properly done... No review is neccessary since the last two AFDs were simply prematurely closed. The resolution is simple, and does not require a Deletion Review. Let an AFD last for more than 7 days and have an admin close it..--Learneggs12 (talk) 19:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some friendly advice - you aren't going to accomplish anything positive by revert-warring over this. The proper forum for having the community reconsider the close is Deletion review. Townlake (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Learneggs12_reported_by_Drmies_.28Result:_.29. Three times you've restored the AfD tag to the article; three times you've reopened the AfD (if such a thing is even possible). Drmies (talk) 19:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing at AfD. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite 20:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]