User talk:Leandrogfcdutra

Welcome

Hello, Leandrogfcdutra! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Leandrogfcdutra, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Leandrogfcdutra! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

N. F. S. Grundtvig and date links

Thanks for your contributions to this article. Please note that Wikipedia doesn't link years, so your elaborate piping to link the second part of various year ranges was incorrect. Ranges of years within one century should be written as eg 1952-55 - two digits after the dash, even if in same decade; there were certainly some wrongly written ones (1952-1955 type) to be corrected. I'm not sure about the removal of punctuation in his name - might come back to that or let another editor do it. PamD 08:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture of Denmark

You have been changing the reference style of the GA-quality article Architecture of Denmark. Why? The previous reference style was not wrong; it is allowed. Please see WP:CITEVAR. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was inconsistent and incomplete. Or did I misundertood it?

—Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that you are correct, that the GA version of the article was not consistent. Feel free to continue in your effort to bring consistency to the article. Binksternet (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I do find unsettling to receive such admonishements, so it is quite a relief to be able to explain myself.

— Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 00:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anthony Comstock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Church

Egg (chair) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to DKR

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Random Quest

Hello, Leandrogfcdutra, and thanks for the work you did on Random Quest. Unfortunately I rushed in and, in an attempt to remove the spaced em dashes which MOS:DASH disallows, I undid a lot more. However, in subsequent edits I have repaired the damage I did. Sorry about that. With regard to the dash style, MOS:DASH allows either spaced en dashes or unspaced em dashes, so since I think the original author seems to have been aiming for the former, I have kept your spaces and changed the dashes. (The spaced en dash is the usual British way, so it also seems appropriate since Wyndham was British :) Sorry again for my bungled and clumsy editing. – Hebrides (talk) 13:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping the Global Economy

Hi Leandrogfcdutra, I am looking for volunteers to re-create the link below for all 196 countries. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States The goal of this project is to map out the global economy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnabber091 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For your work on Boston Marathon bombings. Bearian (talk) 22:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SCons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SGI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Kermit Gosnell, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have been doing that, except often the change is to a reference which will not show in a section preview. Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 01:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are editing sections, are you removing the automatic part of the edit summary which shows the section you are working on? Elizium23 (talk) 01:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I fear so, shouldn’t I? Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 02:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could consider editing the whole article instead. That would permit you to preview changes to references, as well as make several changes at once. Elizium23 (talk) 03:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but then, in my experience, I risk more edit conflicts. Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 11:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Normans may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Normans may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to XML may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to XML may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spaces

Hello, I have recently seen your edits to the article Cleveland, and noticed that you inserted redundant spaces into it. A link to another Wikipedia article should have a [[Name|abc]] format, rather than a [[Name | abc]] one. For more information relating to those redundant spaces, see WP:LINK, WP:CITEFOOT and Template:Cite news (or another related template). Best, Toccata quarta (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it works both ways, and it is easier to parse with a space. Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

True, but none of those pages mentions it as an alternative, and I have always placed consistency before editing comfort. Best, Toccata quarta (talk) 04:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is not only editing, and not only comfort. Parsing is primarily about reading and being able to quickly make sense of a particular instance of template usage — that ends up making it easier to edit too, but it is first about reading. It also, by the way, helps in making whole lines more readable, by enabling better line wrapping in the edit boxes. Leandrogfcdutra (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese orthography - personal names

I see from your edits to Roberto Azevêdo that you have an interest in "standard" Portuguese orthography. I am wondering whether you noticed my thoughts on this, in relation to personal names, at Talk:Roberto Azevêdo? The uncited alternative spellings postulated do seem like original research, and I cannot find anything that gives an authoritative view on the status of personal names. In any case, do you think such spellings have any formal status? It could be argued that personal names are not Portuguese words, especially in Brazil where immigrants' names are so varied and disparate. Can we discuss this here? Davidships (talk) 18:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Please cease editing with this account and request an unblock of User:Leandrod at User talk:Leandrod instead. Fram (talk) 12:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Helvetica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Czech

ZOG (hypertext) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to PNG

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes on author pages

Since you are the leading registered editor in terms of edits at John Wyndham in the past year, you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Novels#Derivative_works_and_cultural_references_templates regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]