User talk:Le Blue Dude

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Le Blue Dude! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 05:29, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

current events 11 feb 08 vandalism

I never called you a nazi. What i DID say was that your intolerance of other people's religions is remarkably common to the behavior of the KKK and nazis. Please do not distort nor vandalize any more articles on this encyclopedia. I have no issue with Scientology or those who oppose it. I have been editing (current events in particular) for a long time. You have edited about 5 articles in your 3 day wikipedia career and ALL your edits have an anti-scientology bias. How about trusting a senior editor with something he knows about instead of vandalizing further articles. The KKK gathering and burning a cross is not news. A gang of skinheads vandalising a synagogue is not news. A bunch of yokels in Buffalo Grove beating a muslim is not news. Religious persecution, wherever it is, IS NOT NEWS. I hope this helps. WikiTony (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

"im sure the KKK and neo-nazis are demonstrating somewhere today too. maybe you should go join them."

The protest is not against the religion, as I have stated before. It is against the usery. And why isn'y important. What's important is 10,000 people (roughly) world wide. 21:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

As for my career it's very on-again, off again. All I'm doing here is mentioning a fucking protest. Can't a guy mention a protest? Nazis vandalising a synagaug is also news, you know. It lets the normal people know what's going on, good or bad. information is information. The more of it out there, the betterLe Blue Dude (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"im sure the KKK and neo-nazis are demonstrating somewhere today too. maybe you should go join them." this is certainly NOT calling you a nazi. you're even wrong about the term. it clearly says neo-nazi, not nazi, and no, i was not calling you a neo-nazi either. And, no, a synagogue being vandalised (as terrible an act as it is) is not current geo-political news worthy of current events status and neither is this dribble. WikiTony (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I'm frustrated, so I'm going to let off steam by talking like a stereotype. I'm calling the mediation cabal, m'kay? Thanks princess 21:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

1. "frusterated?" 2. what stereotype are you referring to? i honestly cannot tell. 3. princess? WikiTony (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Princess is me talking like a sterotype, m'kay princess? 21:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)~

February 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Portal:Current events/2008 February 10. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC) kay 00:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 8 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Portal:Current events/2008 February 10. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Don't ever tell me what to do again. WikiTony (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't tell you what to do, I offered you advice politely. It is up to you if you will accept it? Le Blue Dude (talk) 05:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Le_Blue_Dude reported by User:Hornpipe2 (Result: ). Thank you. Hornpipe2 (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored

See WP:NOTCENSORED. Please don't remove that link. — Czello ^(music) 14:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Sinfest

Hello Le Blue Dude. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint about you at the noticeboard. If you revert the article again you are risking a block. It would take more than a 2:1 plurality to override an established Wikipedia policy such as WP:NOTCENSORED. Of course the article could merit deletion for other reasons such as lack of notability. This can be resolved by the AfD. EdJohnston (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]