User talk:Ldshield

You are invited to participate in WikiProject Scouting, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Scouting and Guiding. You may sign up at the project members page, or sign up for our newsletter.

More information

It seems a bit late to welcome you, but welcome at least to editing Scouting articles. --Bduke (Discussion) 07:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of Australian Scouting terms

I have two difficulties with this. One, I do not see how it can easily be sourced. Do you have references to add? Two, I am not seeing articles like this for Scouting in other countries, such as the US or UK? --Bduke (Discussion) 04:59, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bduke: thank you, reasonable points. I do indeed have references, which I have forgotten to add (these are principally the national document Australian Policy & Rules and the state-based Information Books which guide day-to-day operations). I shall amend this ASAP.

Regarding your second point, I did consider a glossary of generic Scouting terms applicable to all countries. However, there's sufficient diversity across the world that any reasonably-comprehensive global glossary would be very long and unwieldy, but there's also enough terminology that means different things in different places that it would likely cause confusion. I would hope that US/UK Scouts will write their own glossaries in the future, and maybe this will inspire them to do so.

Hello, Ldshield. You have new messages at Bduke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bduke (Discussion) 03:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glossary of Australian Scouting terms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glossary of Australian Scouting terms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Australian Scouting terms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hunter Fighter Collection (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hunter Fighter Collection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 09:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ldshield! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 09:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hunter Fighter Collection (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hunter Fighter Collection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]