User talk:Lds.92

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Girlicious (album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. WadeSimMiser (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girlicious

The album is not being released in Canada on July 1st. You can check Universal Canada's website, under the new release section and see that is not listed for a July 1st release date in Canada. http://umusic.ca/newreleases/ Geffen Records label is distributed by Universal Canada Xm2631 (talk) 08:00, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I checked wal-mart online store and it's not listed. Call the store and ask them if it's in stock on July 1st, all the tracks would've leaked out by now. Someone else also posted a tracklisting, but another person removed it. I can bet that they are still working on tracks. The resources for the August release date were from a record label press release. About July 1st... guess we'll see. I would like to listen to the album too, but just trying to keep the wikipedia article accurate. Xm2631 (talk) 19:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can a store get 30 copies in for a july 1st release date and be "sold out"? already? It wasn't even listed on the wal-mart website for Pre-Order. That seems bizarre to me. Xm2631 (talk) 20:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So I guess you didn't get the album today? Told you. Xm2631 (talk) 02:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of G.I.R.L.I.C.I.O.U.S

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article G.I.R.L.I.C.I.O.U.S, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Movingboxes (talk) 07:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liar Liar (Girlicious song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liar Liar (Girlicious song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 15:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Patron Tequila (song)

A tag has been placed on Patron Tequila (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. OlYeller^Talktome 19:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patron Tequila (song)

I have nominated Patron Tequila (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patron Tequila (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OlYeller^Talktome 02:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patron Tequila (song)

I have nominated Patron Tequila (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patron Tequila (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OlYeller^Talktome 02:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:ChrystinaSayers.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:ChrystinaSayers.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 23:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]