User talk:Ldglenn

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Franklin Road Academy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please do NOT remove cited information from our articles, history should not be ignored or re-written - Arjayay (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with article

Hello,

I recently tried to delete an inaccurate statement about Franklin Road Academy, and you asked that I not remove cited articles. The citing is referenced to page 1; however, if you read the cited article on that page, it does not, in any form suggest the statement you refused to take down. I will be happy to type out what the article says if you are unable to read it, but nowhere does it say what someone has accused FRA's founding upon, and in no way does it give any attribution to our founding head of school.

Therefore, I have taken down the statements (again) in an effort to be factual about the school.

I am going to update the correct information with correct references. Thank you.

I’ve added transcribed text from the article. Billhpike (talk) 00:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We do not care particularly what the folks who started the school have to say about themselves, nor do we care what the current people associated with the school have to say about it. That is not the purpose of an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia's purpose is to summarize what has been written about a given subject in reliable sources, totally independent of the subject. This article is not for the school. It is about the school. There are highly reliable academic sources that state unequivocally that this school was founded as a seg academy. If that is uncomfortable for the current school community, tough! Facts are facts. The school was founded by racists for racists. If you don't like that fact, disassociate yourself from the school, cause it is the truth. John from Idegon (talk) 00:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Franklin Road Academy. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Franklin Road Academy was changed by Ldglenn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850269 on 2017-12-30T03:10:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Franklin Road Academy. You are not removing inaccurate information, you are removing very well sourced accurate information that you do not like. If you do it again, you will be looking at losing your editing privileges. If you do have reliable sources independent of the school that clearly state this was not founded as a segregation academy, bring that information to the article talk page for discussion so we can come to a consensus as to what to include in the article. If not, just stop. This article is not here to paint this institution that was founded as a bastion of hatred and racism in sunny bright colors. Revisionism is not going to fly here. John from Idegon (talk) 03:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ldglenn reported by User:Billhpike (Result: ). Thank you. Billhpike (talk) 10:11, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Franklin Road Academy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any more edit warring after this block expires will probably result in another block for a significantly longer time. Use the article's talk page to discuss your concerns and please read the note below. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ldglenn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:19, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]