User talk:Lcmedia

License tagging for Image:Vega-secondlife2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vega-secondlife2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vega-secondlife1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vega-secondlife1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lichtenstein creative media

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lichtenstein creative media, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lcmedia.com/aboutlcm.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 16:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lichtenstein Creative Media

A tag has been placed on Lichtenstein creative media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Onnaghar talk.review 16:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd rader

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lloyd rader, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/R/RA001.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lloyd rader

A tag has been placed on Lloyd rader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 12:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Rader

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lloyd Rader, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/R/RA001.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Lloyd Rader

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lloyd Rader, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/R/RA001.html. As a copyright violation, Lloyd Rader appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lloyd Rader has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lloyd Rader and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Lloyd Rader with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lloyd Rader.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Please note that even if the copyright issue were resolved, the promotional tone of a company or personal website may well be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. JohnCD (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Your addition to Lloyd Rader has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Due to the multiple copyright issues with your recent contributions, please do review our copyright policies before contributing any further, as the next occurence will lead to a removal of your editing privileges. MLauba (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please create a new account with a username that represents only you. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may ask for a review of this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:22, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lloyd E. Rader, Sr.

The article Lloyd E. Rader, Sr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Brief, biographical only, no sources given. If the goal is notability as a politician it needs to be cited and the article focus.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♪ daTheisen (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Throwaway Kids

The article Throwaway Kids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Improperly sourced, one ref is another Wikipedia page, the other two are articles about one of the subjects of the documentary, not the program itself. A search did not produce any better results.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lloyd E. Rader, Sr.

~~The article Lloyd E. Rader, Sr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:~~

Strong personal attacks in a biographical article are, at present, non-verifiable as sources given are locked by subscription and cannot be checked. Essentially no article content beyond these statements.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♪ daTheisen (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PROD have been removed from page in question buy third party, but unnecessary to escalate to AfD as I have resolved all issues with the editor. Most pleasant! ♪ daTheisen (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lcmedia

(reposted from User talk:Beeblebrox)

I understand you blocked my user name. Was there a reason for that? I tried to reach you through Wikipedia, but I couldn't post through my account. I sent you an email, but wasn't sure if you would get it, so I created a new user account to leave you a message. Can you please advise? I have used that user name for nearly 15 years on every web account I have. It's also the name that I use as a producer (it's short for "Lichtensstein creative media").

You can post something, but likely I wont see it as I am not checking my talk page regularly, but you can reach me at billlichtenstein@gmail.com

Thank you and I look forward to your response.

BL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tempaccount2009 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason the account is blocked is explained in the blocking notice at User talk:Lcmedia. As you explained in your message, the name represents a business. That is a violation of our username policy. Usernames should represent individuals not businesses. You should still be able to edit the Lcmedia talk page if you wish to request an unblock and a new username. Since you say it may be a while till you see this and my talk page is fairly active, I'll repost this at your talk pages. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lcmedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing regarding my user name LCMEDIA and user account, which was blocked. I am requesting that the account be unblocked, and that the account name be changed to BLCMEDIA, a user name representing Bill Lxxxx creative media, if that is available. The use of LCMEDIA was not intended as a corporate moniker; it is the user name I have used for 15 years on the Internet, and, along with "LCM," is an informal nickname for my Peabody Award-winning media production company, Lichtenstein Creative Media, Inc. If possible, I would very much like to continue using it; it not, I can switch it. Thank you.

Decline reason:

The requested name is just as flagrant a violation as the current name, and as such I must decline this request. Usernames cannot represent a company under any circumstance. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 04:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bill in OKC 1982.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]