User talk:Lb6578/articledraft

Peer review by Ksilver19

Lead: The lead provides a good introduction and overview of the topic. It may be a good idea to add some references to this section and add a few phrases to reflect your new contributions. Some of the already existing information may be best placed under new headings to ensure the lead is concise.

Content: Great additions to the article! All content added is relevant and helps with understanding of the topic. The information seems to be up to date.

Tone and Balance: The information provided is presented in a neutral fashion. The article gives a good overview of information without appearing biased to any particular opinions.

Sources and References: The added sources are current and thorough. All links seem to work. There are a few phrases that may need an added citation, but overall this is well done.

Organization: Great job at adding more sections and reorganizing the article. It really helps with the flow of information and comprehension of the topic. It may be helpful to place some of the information from the lead in a new section, for example making the information about the occurrence of the behaviour its own section. Added information is organized well. There may be a few phrases that could be reworded to be more concise, but overall the additions are very well written.

Images and media: Good choice of image to add to the article, as it shows an example of a species that exhibits the behaviour. Good caption. Image adheres to copyright regulations.

Overall, you've made some great contributions to improve the article, and reorganized the existing information well. I would suggest just a few minor edits. Good work! Ksilver19 (talk) 22:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)