User talk:Lazborn

Edo State

Hello. Your recent edit to Edo State appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks , corrections taken Lazborn (talk) 07:28, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edo State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bini. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, I just received the information that I've been blocked due to some abuse of privileges and suspicious editing pattern, first i would want to apologize for the mistakes as I've no intention of causing disruption or violating the Wikipedia guidelines and regulations. On this note I'm tendering an unreserved apologies and I promise it won't happened again. Secondly I want to please be specifically be informed on how I abused the editing privilege and suspicious edits that I made as I really want to learn from those mistakes of mine to enable me be a better editor in future endeavors. Thanks as I wait for a positive response Lazborn (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham87:Good day, I just received the information that I've been blocked due to some abuse of privileges and suspicious editing pattern, first i would want to apologize for the mistakes as I've no intention of causing disruption or violating the Wikipedia guidelines and regulations. On this note I'm tendering an unreserved apologies and I promise it won't happened again. Secondly I want to please be specifically be informed on how I abused the editing privilege and suspicious edits that I made as I really want to learn from those mistakes of mine to enable me be a better editor in future endeavors. Thanks as I wait for a positive response Lazborn (talk) 06:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I simply don't believe you and that's all I'm going to say. Graham87 (talk) 12:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Graham87!

I understand trust is earned over a period of time. I joined Wikipedia over a year ago on the notion of helping contribute to some of all human knowledge, bridging Content Gap and contributing reliable, accurate and verifiable information.

In the first few months, I was largely passive until I was reading a medical laboratory info that I saw the citation needed tag. I made efforts to get it fixed and ever since, most my edits revolve around fixing citation tag until recently I learnt how to add Wiki links. Seeing (on my User home page) the little efforts I have made and how people all over the world benefits by reading it gives me joy and the zeal to continue.

I would implore you to assume good faith and give me a second chance. I promise not to abuse these privileges going forward. Thanks for your time and consideration. Regards! Lazborn (talk) 14:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious. You've been making mass semi-automated edits of little utility. Graham87 (talk) 12:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day @Graham87!

Thank you for finding your time to reply my messages. Despite you saying you "don't believe" me, I would once again implore you to good faith in any mistake I must have made unintentionally and plead you kindly reconsider and unblock my account.

I would be glad if you could explain what "mass semi-automated edits" mean as most of my edit are all manually done on phone. Thanks for your time and consideration.

Regards! Lazborn (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. If you were actually doing all those edits manually, it means you must be far too incompetent to edit here. Also see below. Graham87 (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Graham87 (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've just gotten your email; I've removed email access too now. The short answer to your email is ... no. Graham87 (talk) 16:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]