User talk:LauriV1998

LauriV1998, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LauriV1998! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your edits on Russian Armed Forces

Hello. Your edits have been reverted since what you added to the article isn't what the source says. According to the source the Russian Armed Forces have been ordered to increase its strength to a total of 1.9 million, out of which 1 million is to be military personnel, and they're the only ones who count (just as with all other countries). It's also just a target, not the current strength. When you find a source at mid-year or later that says they've reached the 1 million, you can add it, but not until then. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 20:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As an addendum to Thomas.W's comment, please read WP:CRYSTAL. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Your recent editing history at Russian Armed Forces shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
See also obviously related Special:Contributions/81.156.118.123 who is tag-teaming with this user, with the two taking turns adding the exact same material to the exact same articles, over and over again. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 17:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Russian Armed Forces, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Could you please provide the full citation for this edit as it cannot be verified. You keep making unsourced changes to the same article and it's getting annoying. Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LauriV1998. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LauriV1998. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]