User talk:LauraWilliamson
Welcome!
[edit]Hi LauraWilliamson! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Atlantic is a reliable source.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Oh yes I thought it probably was, but didn't think the blogs or maybe the other sources were.LauraWilliamson (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)- Read WP:RS and WP:EW then please.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's funny, because I won a 24h ban trying to prevent an unmotivated deletion of a source of The Atlantic, by LauraWilliamson and another user. My fault that I don't study the rules on edit warring. Peace, let's start over.--Mhorg (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Well yes because I didn't edit war where as you did. I reverted you twice, you inserted and reinserted the content 6 times. Edit warring is defined by making more than 3 reverts within 24 hours. You still don't get it, do you?LauraWilliamson (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- It's funny, because I won a 24h ban trying to prevent an unmotivated deletion of a source of The Atlantic, by LauraWilliamson and another user. My fault that I don't study the rules on edit warring. Peace, let's start over.--Mhorg (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Read WP:RS and WP:EW then please.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]I have no time to go deeper into it, so I left a notice at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Alexei Navalny, Mhorg, and LauraWilliamson looking for a user to make a fourth revert in hope someone will take a look.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.