User talk:Laughing sandbags
Welcome!
|
Is featured at #wikiwomeninred on twitter today - thx for updating Victuallers (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Faulty ISBN
[edit]Hey, in this edit you added an ISBN for the book Imperial Reckoning by Caroline Elkins … but that's not the ISBN. The digits you used are the odd numbers ascending, and even descending, from 1 to 10, probably because they're printed nearby in the front matter of the book. I'd usually fix this myself, but I don't know which version of the book you used, so I can't decide between the two 13-digit ISBNs listed for the book on WorldCat. Would you please fix it? :) Thanks, {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 19:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Done! Thank you for spotting this. Laughing sandbags (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
You've Got Mail
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
This pertains to your Adam Matthew application. Best regards, Peripatetic / Peripatetic (talk)
@Peripatetic: Many thanks for the quick approval! I was wondering if you could check whether my Adam Matthew application is still in process? I received a form to fill out by e-mail but haven't heard anything since I returned it. I know these things take time, but I just wanted to make sure I didn't miss a step somewhere along the way. Thanks again!
@Peripatetic: Thanks for setting up the Adam Matthew trial access for me! Much appreciated. Laughing sandbags (talk) 16:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
@Laughing sandbags: Does your access work now? --Peripatetic (talk) 10:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
@Peripatetic: Yes, thanks! Looks like there is a whole world of interesting material available there. Laughing sandbags (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
@Peripatetic: It's too bad that access to the East India Company collection is not included in the Adam Matthew Digital trial. If they are looking for feedback from Wikipedia Library users at any point, I would like to submit a request for inclusion of this resource. Laughing sandbags (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Edward Maxwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial Secretary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John Ellingham Brooks
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that John Ellingham Brooks, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
- It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
@Robert McClenon: Thanks for reviewing the page. I think you may have caught it when I was editing the biography template (I should figure out how to edit this without saving it first). To make matters worse, I seem to have incorrectly removed the speedy deletion tag myself. Please feel free to take another look and accept my apologies for the rookie editing mistakes.
- It looks okay to me. In my personal opinion, anyone who lived a hundred years ago about whom there are reasonable records is probably notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from John Ellingham Brooks, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Searle
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Alan Searle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 15:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
@El cid, el campeador:Thanks for your attention to this article! I've tried to make a case for preserving it on the talk page.Laughing sandbags (talk) 15:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
I've removed the CSD tag - I think at the very least he could redirect to Somerset Maugham's article and have a footnote there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chen Kuan-Hsing
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chen Kuan-Hsing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.academia.edu/34023910/iacs2017_conferencebook.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. North America1000 05:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Laughing sandbags. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Laughing sandbags. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Draft:James B. Pinker concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James B. Pinker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: James B. Pinker has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)