User talk:Lasuisflavus

Welcome!

Hello, Lasuisflavus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Ranga shipwrecked at Dunmore head, Dingle, Ireland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ranga shipwrecked at Dunmore head, Dingle, Ireland.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the photos - since you took them yourself - just add {{t|PD-self}} to keep the bot happy. Please consider joining WP:IMAR - ClemMcGann (talk) 15:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting my wrong revert

Thanks for the revert of Ranga reverted to wrong version.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Ranga has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Elassint (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of beagle, harrier and basset packs of the United Kingdom

The article List of beagle, harrier and basset packs of the United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of non-notable subjects.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:48, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of beagle, harrier and basset packs of the United Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of beagle, harrier and basset packs of the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of beagle, harrier and basset packs of the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 07:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of bloodhound packs of the United Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bloodhound packs of the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bloodhound packs of the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AusLondonder (talk) 14:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]