User talk:Lastsolfa

Welcome!

Hello, Lastsolfa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 03:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

You appear to be missing a point. I don't have to source a reversion. You were the one claiming only "some American and Israeli" agencies reported the suicide. In other words, you added something new to the article. I reverted that because it was unsourced and wrong. Here's a French site with the same story, for example[1]. And another one2013/ 06/ pourquoi-le-fils-de-hassan-rohani-le-nouveau-president-iranien-sest-s uicide/. Adding French/German/Chinese sources to an article on the English Wikipedia that isn't about anything specific French/German/Chinese doesn't make sense, and is also unnecessary when there are English sources available. Cheers, Yintan 00:33, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I said this is not a news outlet, it is a blog which is linking back to the Ynet article already sourced. I'm not missing any points, you appear to be looking at the article as a scientific article, which is fair enough. I am including the political context in which the claim is made. I believe it is necessary.

Fine with me, but discuss it on the Talk page and leave the article alone. Your edit warring today could get you blocked in no time, you've more than broken the rules. Cool down, for your own sake. Yintan 00:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your tone seems to be threatening! As I said there IS a point in naming Israeli and American outlets and it is provide the necessary political context. It is not redundant information. Of course anybody could refute the point by sourcing to articles from news outlets from other countries.

It's not a threat, it's a friendly warning. I haven't officially warned or reported you yet because you appear to be a new editor, but if another editor sees your edit warring and reports you, you've got a problem. And again, people don't have to refute your new points, you have to show your new stuff is correct. Again, discuss it on the article's Talk first. Yintan 00:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HistorNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. GreyShark (dibra) 18:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]