User talk:Lasto4ka1

This is Lasto4ka1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baltic Ground Services (BGS) has been accepted

Baltic Ground Services (BGS), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

etothepi 👽 ^(u)•(t) 13:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KlasJet (June 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems notable, but the lead section is way too promotional. A reader just needs the basics.

For example: KlasJet is a Lithuanian business aviation company, providing charter flights and private jets for clients. The company, founded in 2014, is based at Vilnius International Airport.

That's not perfect, but it can help point you in the right direction.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KlasJet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:KlasJet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lasto4ka1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AviaAM Financial Leasing China (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

insufficient WP:RS to demonstrate notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AviaAM Financial Leasing China and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AviaAM Financial Leasing China, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 04:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AviationCV.com (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AviationCV.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AviationCV.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasto4ka1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, @Yunshui:, my account was blocked, yet I see no reason for such action. I am currently collecting information and writing about “Avia Solutions Group” - a controlling organization of multiple companies in aviation industry. Relevant content about the group includes blocked pages: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Baltic_Ground_Services, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:FL_Technics, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:AviationCV.com and https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Helisota. My focus and interest is to cover full structure of this aviation industry group and it’s companies ( https://www.aviasg.com/en/group-companies/controlled-companies.html ). I have no interest in using other accounts or confront any sock puppetry regulations, thus please specify the reason why my account was blocked so that I could give You respective appeal.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. You are confirmed as the same person behind the blocked accounts, Jklmnopr (talk · contribs) and Rasakoj (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 11:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasto4ka1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Yamla:, In deed these two accounts are mine. However both of them were used for the same purpose – analysis and coverage of previously mentioned „Avia Solutions Group“ and its companies. Perhaps You could specify reason of blocking my first account in order to resolve issue? As stated, I have no interest in confronting sock puppeting rules and certainly do not want to waste the job done so far. At this point I have prepared drafts for several other companies too. I am willing to revise and update previously published content if necessary and put all the effort to comply to the requirements in future. Thus once again, I would be glad if could review my account again Lasto4ka1 (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be allowed to edit until your original account is unblocked. Revoking talk page access as you have admitted sockpuppetry and block evasion, and this account is not eligible for unblock consideration. All of your contributions will be removed. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lasto4ka1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25102 was submitted on May 15, 2019 08:30:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]