Jump to content

User talk:Lasto4ka1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baltic Ground Services (BGS) has been accepted

[edit]
Baltic Ground Services (BGS), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

etothepi 👽 (u)•(t) 13:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KlasJet (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lasto4ka1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 04:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AviationCV.com (July 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

[edit]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasto4ka1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, @Yunshui:, my account was blocked, yet I see no reason for such action. I am currently collecting information and writing about “Avia Solutions Group” - a controlling organization of multiple companies in aviation industry. Relevant content about the group includes blocked pages: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Baltic_Ground_Services, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:FL_Technics, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:AviationCV.com and https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Helisota. My focus and interest is to cover full structure of this aviation industry group and it’s companies ( https://www.aviasg.com/en/group-companies/controlled-companies.html ). I have no interest in using other accounts or confront any sock puppetry regulations, thus please specify the reason why my account was blocked so that I could give You respective appeal.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. You are confirmed as the same person behind the blocked accounts, Jklmnopr (talk ¡ contribs) and Rasakoj (talk ¡ contribs). Yamla (talk) 11:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasto4ka1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

@Yamla:, In deed these two accounts are mine. However both of them were used for the same purpose – analysis and coverage of previously mentioned „Avia Solutions Group“ and its companies. Perhaps You could specify reason of blocking my first account in order to resolve issue? As stated, I have no interest in confronting sock puppeting rules and certainly do not want to waste the job done so far. At this point I have prepared drafts for several other companies too. I am willing to revise and update previously published content if necessary and put all the effort to comply to the requirements in future. Thus once again, I would be glad if could review my account again Lasto4ka1 (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will not be allowed to edit until your original account is unblocked. Revoking talk page access as you have admitted sockpuppetry and block evasion, and this account is not eligible for unblock consideration. All of your contributions will be removed. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lasto4ka1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


UTRS appeal #25102 was submitted on May 15, 2019 08:30:19. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 08:30, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]