User talk:Lantzy

Thanks a lot

Thank yyoz for your fast and very useable answer in connection with best sellers. --Ksanyi (talk) 19:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy question at RD/H

You are of course correct that the answer is Hegel. Such ideas are omnipresent in his work one of the most major themes - so much so that anyone who doesn't realize this can't be said to understand Hegel at all. (So you clearly understand him better than Clio etc.) Look in a myriad of places in his History of Philosophy. Many of his most famous sentences are relevant - Just from memory - Phenomenology of Spirit - preface - No philosophy that deserves the name can be or ever has been refuted, one can just as well say that a flower refutes the bud. Philosophy of History, introduction - When philosophy begins to paint its grey on grey, some form of life must have grown old. The Owl of Minerva flies at dusk. The whole of his philosophy is devoted to the notion (IMHO quite true) that Philosophy is identical to the History of Philosophy - that each philosophy describes the world as well as the human race can describe its understanding at the time and that the history of philosophy shows mankind pulling himself up by his own bootstraps, building an endless philosophical system as he as discovers conceptual building blocks that help him understand the world as best he can at any given time. Hegel of course felt he was the last word at the time, but was not under the impression that history would stop in 1831. His self assessment in the Phenomenology is that no one knows better than him the defects of his work, but that he knows he was on the right road. He was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.234.15.152 (talk) 05:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I've made this edit :-) hydnjo talk 01:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperbole

You made this edit in response to my objection to your statement that 99% of films are about how white men see themselves. Presumably, therefore, you're now saying that you didn't mean the 99% figure to be taken literally. So, what percentage of films do you think are about how white men see themselves? My point is that such films are no more common than any other type of film. --Richardrj ^talk ^email 13:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that's exactly the point I was trying to make in my last sentence above. It's simply not true to say that white males continue to exert a disproportionate influence in Hollywood. Look at the Hollywood films on general release at any given time. They're about all kinds of experiences; those of women, ethnic minorities, children, immigrants, the elderly, gays... you name it, there's a film about it. I'd be interested if you could tell me where you perceive this disproportionate influence to be present, because it just doesn't accord with my own perception of the American film industry. --Richardrj ^talk ^email 18:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're dealing in academic generalities, not in grounded specifics. I've served my time in academia, and I have no wish to return there or to engage in academic discourse, which with rare exceptions serves no useful purpose whatsoever. Have a look, instead, at the top ten grossing films for 2008, as listed in 2008 in film. There, we have The Dark Knight, Indiana Jones, Iron Man, Hancock and James Bond, all of which are about male superheroes, one of whom is black. The others are white, but do those films depict either lived white experience, or lived male experience? No, they do not. (To take the most obvious example: do the James Bond films support a white male-centric view of the world? No, not at all.) Then we have Kung Fu Panda, Madagascar 2, Wall-E and Narnia, all of which are for children and depict experience as it is lived - or as we fondly imagine it is lived - by kids, animals and robots. Lastly, there is Mamma Mia, a chick flick par excellence. If I cared to, I could continue down the list of films released in 2008. How many of them support your argument that women and minorities are marginalised in Hollywood? Very few. --Richardrj ^talk ^email 20:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Justo Jorge Padrón

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Justo Jorge Padrón. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Justo Jorge Padrón

The article Justo Jorge Padrón has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 01:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for José Albi

On June 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article José Albi, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN for Rodolfo Torre Cantú

On 29 June 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Rodolfo Torre Cantú, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RD/L#Size_of_vocabulary_required_to_understand_TV?

Hi - you left a tantalising link on the ref desk, but the URL is faulty. Could you correct it? Thanks. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leismo

Thanks for the response. So then in A lo que una dama le contesta, is lo the direct object, as in what she said, while le refers to him? Grsz 11 04:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mystery_melody.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Mystery_melody.ogg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pancracio Celdrán

The article Pancracio Celdrán has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. E Wing (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

You've been active on Wikipedia long enough that you should be familiar with WP:BLP. But judging by your edit of Carl Kruger,[1] I'm not so sure. Please review that policy. Will Beback talk 06:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I've started a thread on the talk page about how this matter could be handled properly. Will Beback talk 21:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Rational Skepticism WikiProject member asking for look at Theosophy entry

Since you are an active participant in the Rational Skepticism WikiProject, would you mind looking over the Wikipedia entry on Theosophy to see if you find any concerns?

I've been ordered to fix the page so that it accords with my understanding of the NPOV policy. I'm happy to do that but I have a lot of work at my job.

Now I've been told that I must make the changes by April 30th or the NPOV tag will be removed. I simply can't learn how to use Wikipedia as a newcomer, become familiar with all the sources, and make the edits if I must do it all by April 30th.

Would you look over the Theosophy page? Also, can you recommend anything? Thanks much,Factseducado (talk) 15:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fire, Water, and Brass Pipes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aleksei Smirnov

Vera Altayskaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Typecast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mikhail Yanshin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Three Sisters and Griboyedov

The Magic Weaver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mikhail Kuznetsov

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kashchey the Deathless (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marek Weber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Two-step (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los argentinos somos derechos y humanos.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Los argentinos somos derechos y humanos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 18:33, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Los argentinos somos derechos y humanos.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Los argentinos somos derechos y humanos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lantzy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Futility Closet Podcast

The article Futility Closet Podcast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable podcast lacking in-depth, non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 16:53, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with this proposed deletion. Let me know what I can do to help.--Toploftical (talk) 07:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I left a new message for you on my talk page.--Toploftical (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes

The article List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undue collection of trivial information about a podcast; Futility Closet Podcast is nominated for PROD as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Futility Closet Podcast for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Futility Closet Podcast is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futility Closet Podcast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lantzy. I have changed the name and begun making major revisions to Futility Closet. For the moment I have taken out the infobox. We can put it all back once we get the balance between the blog and the podcast straightened out. Please have a go at expanding and revising the page. More needs to be said about the blog and, perhaps, a little bit less about the podcast. (It is IMHO just a tiny bit bloated.) But use your judgement. We also want to save your truly excellent List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes. Time is of the essence. I will be watching and helping as much as I can. But I regard this page as your baby and will defer to your choices. Just in case, I have saved both your original pages in my private workspace HERE.--Toploftical (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFSPAM

I would like to alert you to the large number of mentions of Futility Closet podcasts on Wikipedia. These contravene WP:REFSPAM. Please would you take a look at the Wikipedia protocol on this subject. May I ask that you desist in making edits of this type, which will all have to be reverted. (You are quite welcome to assist with these reverts if you so wish.)

I note, also, that Futility Closet has extensively plagiarised at least one Wikipedia article, and a brief study suggests that this is not the only instance. In fact, your exercise in providing publicity to this podcast is the reason why this plagiarism has been brought to light. The plagiarism issue will be dealt with separately elsewhere and in due course, but it seems relevant to mention it here.

Thanks,
ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 12:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lantzy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Futility Closet still under attack

Hi Lantzy - see the message I left on Mortee's page about List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes--Toploftical (talk) 22:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Sid and Marty Krofft, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lantzy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a linguistic editor, can you please help me out with the linguistics around digital dependencies and global mental health

RfC open there and social media addiction. Its quite basic linguistics but now the article is being suggested for deletion based on the linguistics. Any thoughts appreciated! --E.3 (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes

Hi Lantzy - I just restored List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes. This is a very professional historical record of a very significant institution. I consulted with several colleagues and they were unanimous in supporting the importance of this list. You did a terrific job writing it and the page should not have been deleted. I added a few minor tweaks. Assuming the restoration survives, somebody should complete the list up to the present time.--Toploftical (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Futility Closet Podcast episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:00, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Cara al Sol

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cara al Sol, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.eldiario.es/cultura/musica/copyright-Cara-entonar-Falange-tribunales_0_955755230.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Cara al Sol and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Cara al Sol, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cara al Sol. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cara al Sol with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cara al Sol saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

If you were formerly User:Binadot, you added the possibly copyrighted lyrics. If you are not Binadot, ignore this.

The link does not go to the source but to an article mentioning the copyright problems with the song. --Error (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Lantzy|<font style="color:black">'''L'''<small>ANTZY</small></font>]][[user talk:Lantzy|<sup>T<small><font style="color:black">ALK</font></small></sup>]]

: LANTZY ^TALK

to

[[User:Lantzy|<span style="color:black">'''L'''<small>ANTZY</small></span>]][[user talk:Lantzy|<sup>T<small style="color:black">ALK</small></sup>]]

: LANTZY ^TALK

—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lantzy. Thank you for creating Yehan Numata. User:CollectiveSolidarity, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consider including the ISBNs of the cited books

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 00:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]