User talk:Langloisrg

This user may have left Wikipedia. Langloisrg has not edited Wikipedia since 7 March 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I am tired of all this

Bullshit! You come after 6 months and tell me that thing? Probably someone took your account and provoked me with that message, there's no other explanation--TheFEARgod (Ч) 22:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and you tell me that after 6 months? --TheFEARgod (Ч) 22:40, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I say that's bullshit again. I never insulted nor reverted you. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 22:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

maybe I did that to your sockpuppet?? --TheFEARgod (Ч) 22:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Langloisrg. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Yours, --TheFEARgod (Ч) 11:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're up to, but this kind of personal attack is not acceptable. Any repeat is likely to get you blocked from editing. Kevin (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:ANI

I have copied this message from the noticeboard to make sure you receive it:

Langloisrg -- if you feel TheFEARgod has behaved inappropriately, the thing to do is file a report on this noticeboard or seek arbitration or otherwise follow the WP:Dispute resolution process. However, the personal attacks (such as adding "asshole" all over TheFEARgod's user page) are not acceptable no matter what. In fact, they would not even be acceptable as retaliation for a direct personal attack -- if, hypothetically, TheFEARgod were to respond by calling you an asshole on your user page, he could be blocked for that.

If you want to seek resolution over the perceived injustices you allege, please follow the directions at WP:Dispute resolution. However, if you continue the personal attacks you will be blocked without further notice. --Jaysweet (talk) 17:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Iraq War

Portal:Iraq War, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Iraq War and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Iraq War during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 02:28, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Operation Crazyhorse Thunder

The article Operation Crazyhorse Thunder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This was a very small-scale military operation, involving a single company. I could not find enough sources to verify notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cerebellum (talk) 23:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Operation Peregrine II

The article Operation Peregrine II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This was a very small-scale military operation, involving a single company. I could not find significant coverage of this operation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cerebellum (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:2003 Operations

Template:2003 Operations has been nominated for merging with Template:Iraq War. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:2004 Operations

Template:2004 Operations has been nominated for merging with Template:Iraq War. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:2005 Operations

Template:2005 Operations has been nominated for merging with Template:Iraq War. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:2006 Iraq Operations

Template:2006 Iraq Operations has been nominated for merging with Template:Iraq War. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Operations of the Iraq war: 2007

Template:Operations of the Iraq war: 2007 has been nominated for merging with Template:Iraq War. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Operation Dragon Fire East

The article Operation Dragon Fire East has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources and lacks notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 03:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]