User talk:Landscape repton

Henry Abner

Hi,
Thanks for your work. I have alerted an Admin. to the situation. I am not sure if the page is suitable for WP:CSD or whether it would have to go to WP:AfD. Stay tuned. Eagleash (talk) 13:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conveyed concept

Good job. Thanks. 85.193.219.160 (talk) 14:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Zarb-e-Sukhan. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 17:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: you've made a mistake here. I removed the notice because the user had copied and pasted the template for the AfD of a different page, they hadn't actually nominated Zarb-e-Sukhan for deletion. As such there was no record in the AfD category of it, or in the log, and the links on the template on the page went to the other page's discussion I noted this both in the edit description, and on the article talk page, and made sure that the user was made aware of the mistake, and pointed them to the guidelines of how to nominate Zarb-e-Sukhan for deletion if they so wished. You appear to have missed all of this. Landscape repton (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ops. Sorry! Alas I was just going to report you. thanks for the note. --Saqib (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxen

I added a new potential candidate for the list of hoaxes on Wikipedia to its talk page, section Nine-year WikiHoax. John_Pelham_(officer), which is an imbedded, partial hoax, rather than a full hoax article, but it did make it in print. D'you think it belongs on the list? Anmccaff (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Moona Sehgal (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Landscape repton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer

Why did you delete the sources (Davidson) from the Akrafena topic in 2017. Kwesi Yema (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]