User talk:Lamronell

Lamronell, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lamronell! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited D Double E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ghetto Gospel: The New Testament

Hi. Please stop inserting half an infobox on this page. It's broken formatting, you haven't sourced anything, and it's not notable per WP:NALBUMS. Thank you. Ss112 12:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Genre changes

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Thank Me Later, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 14:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SummerPhD^v2.0 15:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Usher discography

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Usher discography without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:28, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Last Rocket, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to sult your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on American Gangster (album). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lamronell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at American Gangster (album) and Dreamchasers 3. Dan56 (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Life Is Good (Nas album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Scott (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Jhené Aiko. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:48, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Long Way Home (Krept and Konan album). SummerPhD^v2.0 17:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Headie One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Dark Lane Demo Tapes. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kano discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deptford

Thanks for getting involved in Wikipedia, your efforts are appreciated. I just wanted to let you know that I rolled back your two edits on Deptford because of MOS:OVERLINK and MOS:COMPASS - that is, we generally recommend not linking well known cities such as London in order to not overload an article with too many links, and in the same sentence just a few words later we have a link to London Borough of Lewisham which provides closer detail on the immediate area for those who wish to know more; we also - as a house style - recommend not using capitals on compass points unless they form part of a name, and in this case there is no formal South East London - it is just a general description of an area, so southeast London is the recommended name. I would normally have put an abbreviated form of this in an edit summary, but I used rollback (something I rarely do) and forgot that it doesn't allow you to put in an edit summary! Keep editing! SilkTork (talk) 10:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Acton, London

I have reverted your edit [1] where you have continued to MOS:OVERLINK after being given advice by SilkTork that it is not recommended. Please use talk to explain why you think the manual of style should be ignored.SovalValtos (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Making a mistake in using Wikipedia's house style is understandable and forgivable; but when those mistakes have been corrected, and an explanation given to you, you should not revert back to your individual preference as you have done here: [2]. Such behaviour is referred to as Wikipedia:Edit warring. As a rule of thumb on Wikipedia, never revert someone's correction of your edits without first speaking to them to find out what the issue is, and then getting an agreement that you were in the right. Edit warring is regarded as disruptive behaviour (even when you are in the right - see WP:3RR), and may lead to sanctions such as blocking.

I am currently going through and cleaning up your overlinking and MOS errors; if you wish to help out by reverting your own edits, that would be much appreciated, and would reflect positively on you. SilkTork (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced content to BLP

While cleaning up your recent edits I came upon this: [3]. You added some unsourced material to a biography of living person, what we call a WP:BLP. In itself a small thing, but we do take great care with BLPs because of the harm that can be caused when we get it wrong, so all material added to a BLP must be cited to a reliable source, and I note that you have been warned and blocked for adding unsourced content in the past, and yet continued to add unsourced content after your block, and despite getting further warnings. As such I cannot let this incident pass. I am blocking you for one week. When you return you must edit within our guidelines and policies. SilkTork (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Not3s. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SilkTork (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Xtatik Experience

Hello, Lamronell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Xtatik Experience, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Xtatik Experience

Hello, Lamronell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Xtatik Experience".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to I Am Greater than I Was, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to sult your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]