Jump to content

User talk:Lalvukus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An article you recently created, Butterflies (Gabbie Hanna Song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 22:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

False information on Gabbie Hanna singles

[edit]

I have asked you to stop in edit and you will not obviously. Why do you feel the need to keep adding false information to the page. Perfect Day was not a single! All her pervious singles have been slated to be on the album and she has not said otherwise as she did with Out Loud and Satellite. You are not even using the correct Wikipedia grammar guides. 2WayMirror is not to be capitalized and all quotation marks should be in the " form instead of “. Please stop making false changes. VoltronUniverse (talk) 22:45, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gabbie Hanna. Gemsweater1 (talk) 04:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbie Hanna

[edit]

Hello. First of all, I am a massive fan of Gabbie Hanna. I have not been informed from you ever before so that may be a glitch in Wikipedia. I thought “Perfect Day (A True Story)” was a single but I researched it and it wasn’t. I have no longer continued to put that as a single, but someone else has. I have not added any other false information other than that mistake - She has confirmed that her previous singles except for “Antisocial Media” will be on the new album as she announced at VidCon 2019. I have not put “2WayMirror (stylized as 2WAYMIRROR)” in capitals except for on my draft page for her single “Butterflies” released May 31, 2019. I don’t stalk her like you say, but I do watch her and get enough information of her to edit her page. I do not like being blocked from editing from Wikipedia as it’s a single mistake. I do not like being shouted at in a formal letter and I wish in our communication this does not happen again! I have only edited what I know is true and changed that This Time Next Year will be released in late 2019 because the first half of 2019 as already passed as it is July 16, 2019 the day I’m getting this letter.

I am a new editor! I do see a problem with the charting - Someone keeps changing the U.K. charting from what is correct. I have screenshots of them as “Medicate” and “Honestly/Honestly (Encore)” did hit number 37, 17 & 35 respectively. I don’t know who is changing them.

Thank you for taking time to read this.

I’ll be hearing from you soon. Lalvukus (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

False Information in Gabbie Hanna Singles

[edit]

Hello.

I have told you to stop changing false information about the charts about Gabbie Hanna Singles. I am not editing it since you have threatened to block me from Wikipedia but please don’t put false information on a page.

Thank you for reading this!

I will be hearing from you soon Lalvukus (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The reason most of your edits to Gabbie's page have been reverted is that you have not cited any sources within the article to support any of the edits you have made. If you see the source given for the UK chart dates (here[1]), it lists "Out Loud" as 60, "Honesty" as 81, and "Medicate" as 97. These peaks are from the Official Charts Company UK chart, and are in no way false. From the research I have found, the peaks you gave do not exist, and screenshots are not reliable as a source, since they cannot be verified per WP:VERIFY. You have been asked several times to stop changing this, yet you have continued to do so, which is why you received the block warning. I hope this clears up some of the questions you may have had. Gemsweater1 (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ For peak positions on UK Download:
    • For "Out Loud": "Official Singles Downloads Chart Top 100". Official Charts Company. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
    • For "Honestly": "Official Singles Download Chart Top 100 – Date: 17 August 2018". Official Charts Company. Archived from the original on November 7, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
    • For "Medicate": "Official Singles Download Chart Top 100 – Date: 8 February 2019". Official Charts Company. Retrieved February 9, 2019.

Gabbie Hanna

[edit]

Hi I am sorry about this. I had a mix up between the UK Download and the UK Vodafone charts. I will leave this unless you want not. I have had no warning about this which may have been a glitch because I have been given no warning since. Looking at the last edits, I am not the only one who has given false information although mine had been an accident (e.g. someone called her talentless) I hope they have been warned for vandalism as well and I wonder how can you delete a Wikipedia account? Lalvukus (talk) 20:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 15 Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources cited were not reliable or did not support the content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have gotten tour dates incorrect and will approve deletion of this page - thank you for raising it to our attention

July 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you recently removed content from Adele discography without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ss112 15:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it’s me. I see that your charting is incorrect as the UK resources either come from iTunes/Vodafone or the Official Charts Company. I see that even though you have made a reference to the charting, this is not a fully reliable source as this is not the chart we rely on. I had removed them because the official source of The Official Charts Show does not show the two songs charting I removed on their site. Also, we don’t chart on Wikipedia any charting over #100.

Several things:
  • I didn't add the chart peaks to Adele discography. Please know what you're talking about.
  • Nobody is using iTunes (which is a WP:SINGLEVENDOR) nor the Vodafone chart, the latter of which you seem to be unaware is a top 40. It would be literally impossible to get a peak below 40 from the Vodafone chart. I am baffled as to why you are bringing this up.
  • Yes, we absolutely do add peaks below 100 from the UK if they are sourced, as the UK Singles Chart is (or at least was) a top 200. The website Zobbel.de published entries below the top 100, which, as you seem to be aware, is made available on officialcharts.com. Of course officialcharts.com wouldn't show anything below 100; it only publishes the top 100. If Wikipedia did not accept zobbel.de as an official source, the website would not be encoded for use into Template:Album chart. So you're wrong: it is considered reliable for use. If you don't think it is, you can go to WT:CHARTS and/or Template talk:Album chart and get consensus to have it removed from Wikipedia.
  • Please don't try and come speak to me either here or on my talk page like you know what we do and don't do here—I add charts far more often than you do. You are literally a newbie; you have been here since June this year and are trying to tell me the way we do things here. Sorry, no.
  • Do not remove peaks lower than 100 from the UK columns on discographies or any other article until and unless you have consensus that zobbel.de is not reliable, otherwise you will be warned and may be blocked. It would serve you well to know what you're talking about before attempting to sound like you do. Thank you. Ss112 23:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Butterflies (Gabbie Hanna Song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lalvukus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Butterflies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]