User talk:Lalu Hrishikesh

White Dot ^.☎. - 21:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ayyavazhi

Hrish, I noticed your works(contributions) often in Ayyavazhi related articles. Are you a Ayyavazhi? Paul Raj 15:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment for Ayyavazhi

Thanks for your application for this article to be re-assessed. As the main member of the WikiProject India Assessment team, I would like to inform you that I cannot promote this article much further. However, there is a more formal procedure if you think this article deserves a grade higher than a B-grade. If you believe your article satisfies the current criteria for featured articles available here at WP:WIAFA, then you should place a nomination here at (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates) for your article to be considered for "Feature article status" - the highest grade an article can achieve. If however, your article did not satisfy the criteria, and failed in it's reassessment as a feature article, you could always check if it is in line with Good article standards here WP:WIAGA, then place a nomination here (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles/Nominations) for it to be considered for "Good article" status - the next best grade an article can achieve. Do let me know if your article succeeds or fails under these schemes. I also recommend you pay attention to any feedback that you receive from any reassessment(s) the article may undergo. Please read through the pages I've given you links for (above) carefully. Best wishes - Ncmvocalist 12:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV of Indian Community

No, I don't believe so. If you see the discussion over here, Every questions by them were answered by me under different sections. But see the bottom, without no further comments, they delete Ayyavazhi from the India article. Even though I complain about that, no use. When I reverted undiscussed edits, I was blocked under 3RR. I even cited with University papers. But no use. And I finally understand that, there in that community, if the 'POV' is of a single person it was denied, but if the same is of the majority that will be considered as a 'NPOV'. Do you know? they even started conducting polls against my university books.

I recommend you just ignore that accesment and if can, work on the article. Oh, I can't even say that. May be, this community will unilaterally ask the wikipedian Board to delete the Ayyavazhi article and vote unanimously towards, and no wonder if any such things happens. And all your hard work will be thrown to Air and these people use to enjoy that scene.

So I can't tell anything. anyway, thanks for you works friend. - Paul Raj 18:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Join

Lalu, I've started a new project for Ayyavazhi Wikipedia:WikiProject Ayyavazhi. You have contributed a lot for Ayyavazhi related articles. Pls come and join here in the project. I hope, Thanks - Paul Raj 15:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work Paul, and I've joined. - White Dot...!!!_® 19:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Thanks, very much for nominating Ayyavazhi as a Featured article. But now Ayyavazhi had been removed and it's cuttent status is a Former FA. What shall we do? - PAUL RAJ 09:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ayyavazhi a GA

Lalu, after a long time Ayyavazhi article had now gained a Good article status. Please take a look; I expect you help in the article till it reaches the FA status, Thanks. - PAUL RAJ 22:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your compliments and wishes, Hrish. - PAUL RAJ 20:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Inspite of my bad experience those days I started editing Wikipedia few weeks ago, with nominating the Image to FPC. I am very much determined to work on the Ayyavazhi article to bring up it to a FA level. Hope you'll be helping me. And thanks for your compliments. - Vaikunda Raja (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lalu Hrishikesh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ayyavazhi (film)

The article Ayyavazhi (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only 1 review was found (2 needed). No other reviews or significant coverage was found in a WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayyavazhi (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayyavazhi (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayyavazhi (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 13:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]