User talk:Lalongeeti

Copyright problems with Lalongeeti

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lalongeeti, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lalongeeti.com/. As a copyright violation, Lalongeeti appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lalongeeti has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lalongeeti and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Lalongeeti with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lalongeeti.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 20:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 20:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as seen in Lalon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 20:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue

The owner of (or someone claiming to be the owner of) http://www.lalongeeti.com has provided permission to OTRS. (Note the permission template now at Talk:Lalon)

It appears that the inclusion of the copyrighted material was a contributor to the decision to block. I see that there are other issues as well. I intend to tell the editor to make an unblock request. I haven't followed the history closely enough to know whether this is enough to mitigate the blocking reasons or not.--SPhilbrick (Talk) 18:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]