User talk:Laks883
Who cares do whatever you want go f*ck with your Wikipedia.
July 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Masala dosa, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 14:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Masala dosa. Thank you. TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Masala dosa. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 17:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]Hey!! I noticed you made some edits on Masala Dosa . Please stop your unconstructive edit as the current version is the best and this isn't the place to spread your phobia TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Laks883 Please drop your replies here not in my talk without creating different sections TuluveRai123 (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 1991 anti-Tamil violence in Karnataka, you may be blocked from editing. WikiHannibal (talk) 06:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 1991 anti-Tamil violence in Karnataka. WikiHannibal (talk) 06:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1991 anti-Tamil violence in Karnataka. WikiHannibal (talk) 07:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiHannibal (talk) 09:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.