User talk:Ladydee99

Welcome!

Hello, Ladydee99, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mandolian, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Antrocent (♫♬) 20:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mandolian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mandolian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Antrocent (♫♬) 20:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mandolian

The term Mandolian is in the favour of Worldism Rather then Nationalism So that people do not hate each other in the name of discrimination of nationality. It requests people belongs to any part of the world to unite in the largest unit Worldism. It requests peoples to respect and care each other.

In western part of india Worldism Is also Known as Mandolian. Mandolian hates the System of Boundaries to Differentiate peoples.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladydee99 (talk • contribs)

Please read Wikipedia tutorial and What Wikipedia is Not. utcursch | talk 21:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Charan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 21:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you are same as User:B s khidia, please see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Please do not use Wikipedia to promote yourself. utcursch | talk 21:30, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Charan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Charan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://isudangadhvi.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post.html?m=1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Renee Dhyani

The article Renee Dhyani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 08:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beyhadh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 20:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding B.S. Khidia to the articles without a source that actually mentions this person. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 04:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:Infobox person/doc, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Infobox person/doc. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ladydee99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19249 was submitted on Sep 15, 2017 23:02:26. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Renee Dhyani

The article Renee Dhyani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor actress with nothing significant to show notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravensfire (talk) 21:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhupsa

Hello, Ladydee99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhupsa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Meters (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]