User talk:L E X commons

Welcome!

Hello, L E X commons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Darryl Sloan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darryl Sloan

The article Darryl Sloan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Strike 2D

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Counter-Strike 2D, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.cs2d.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Counter-Strike 2D

The article Counter-Strike 2D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable game. The article doesn't give any sources, and I can't find anything showing why it's notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brussels I

He L E X, great that you have written the Brussels I-jurisdiction article, which is really an asset I think… There is lots of good work to do in the law (especially the private international law area… The point I am a bit concerned about is that we have now a paragraph in Brussels regime and a new article which essentially cover a similar subject but which have been build up in a different way. For a future project you may want to start expanding such a section first; and then, when it becomes to big, make a summary on the main page of the subject, and start a new article by copy pasting the info out… Anyway, good luck with further editing! L.tak (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi L.tak, thanks for your kind words. The reason I wanted to make a seperate article is because these are the rules of the 2001 Brussels Regulation which is soon to expire since the new Recast version will enter into force in 8 months. So this article will be of more of a legal historical use soon. That's why I think it warrants to be a different article, however, we should definitely change the title as to make that clear.L E X commons (talk) 23:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Puik werk betreffende Adnan Januzaj. Je was me voor :) Koen Amatata (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, dankuwel. Ik dacht, laat ik de stormloop naar Januzaj's wikipedia-artikel voor zijn en vlug al een edit maken :-) L E X commons (talk) 17:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bernard Tilleman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bernard Tilleman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. | Naypta^✉ opened his mouth at 11:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a comment on the thread which you started at Naypta--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for openion

Article Legitimacy (criminal law) has been requested to be moved to Legitimacy (law) requesting your openion at Talk:Legitimacy_(criminal_law)

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 05:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]