User talk:LOGANRUN90

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of TomWatkins1970 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

WP:CIRCULAR

Use of Wikipedia as a reference for itself is strictly prohibited by policy at WP:CIRCULAR. Please review this policy, and indicate whether you are willing to conform to the policies of Wikipedia. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

to which part of the article are you stating as reverting the article damages parameters if yo could point out what you mean and the article is failing this can be altered by normal editing factors

To be clear, you can not add a reference to a URL that is merely another Wikipedia article. Wikipedia requires outside sources. bd2412 T 17:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Report to wiki about the behaviour from MEMBER sjo

Could someone please investigate this member behaviour as this member is located in Sweden, they contently vandalise pages remove content just because they have no access to certain information which may be not located in certain countries, this do not mean the information presented on wiki is untrue wiki policy is that any information must be from the following

1- Official Books, Magazines, books, or media

2- information can be used from Pop Magazine, like Smash hits, number one, lookin , popcorn etc as this is information was used in the public domain.

3- sourced content can be found from Fans of the group who may have content that other people don't have.

My may concern is that members is abusing other and disrupting legitimate information from sourced content. ( not all information is found on the web.)

January 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 09:46, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]