User talk:LGBLA

Hello

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Wii. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Wii U, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 21:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at User:Boing! said Zebedee, you may be blocked from editing. Jarkeld (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding "eighth generation" to video game articles. If you want to voice your opinion, come here. And please, provide edit summaries. I usually don't watch that page, but this is the second time you made the genre of Victorious from sitcom to teen sitcom. Provide a reason for this change. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 18:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to ICarly (season 5). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 20:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to iCarly (season 5), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 07:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Victorious episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of Victorious episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kevinbrogers (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Victorious episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kevinbrogers (talk) 20:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Victorious episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kevinbrogers (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for persistently adding unsourced content (despite repeatedly being asked not to), and at times repeatedly adding the same content after others have removed it. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Victorious episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indef block on suspicion of being hijacked

I've indef-blocked your account on the suspicion that it was hijacked. Samsara 05:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]