User talk:L435534l

Welcome!

Hello, L435534l and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 07:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edit Summary Issues

Hi, Please see Wikipedia:Civility: Edit summaries such as 'You are bad person. You guys are not even INDIANs' on List of Indian inventions and discoveries are problematic. Personal attacks should be avoided, and whether an editor is Indian or not is irrelevant to their capacity to edit articles on any subject. Dialectric (talk) 19:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bose at List of Indian inventions and discoveries

I have explained my reasoning at Talk:List of Indian inventions and discoveries, and I would ask you to explain yours before re-adding content that multiple editors deemed inappropriate. By now you seem to be simply edit warring. Huon (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Indian inventions and discoveries shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Huon (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elockid ^(Talk) 20:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

L435534l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been Blocked due to no valid reason. All I wanted was to add Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose's name to the list of Indian inventors as he is a notable name in the field of Radio waves. Even IEEE recognizes his contributions. But it seems like some wikipedia users and their friends are trying to own that particular page and not allow anybody else to make edits. The main culprit is the editor by the name of HUON L435534l (talk) 22:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The policy is pretty clear: you must not edit war, not "you must not edit war unless you believe you're right". Max Semenik (talk) 22:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A few comments from the "main culprit": Firstly, it's a list of Indian inventions, not of Indian inventors, and Bose did not invent radio waves anyway, making them not an Indian invention in the first place (as I've explained on the talk page). Secondly, your addition has by now been reverted by myself, Athenean, Mdw0 and Chipmunkdavis. Unless my Cabal membership card hase gone missing in the mail, this shows not some nefarious clique at work, but rather that there is no consensus for your version. If you want to persuade the other users that some Bose-related invention is missing on the list, please make your case on the talk page and preferably present a reliable source supporting your claim. Thirdly, while reverting me you also happily restored this edit while at the same time admonishing me to read what I revert. I have done so - have you? Huon (talk) 22:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I accept that the page is strictly about inventions and not even about major scientific discoveries and achievements by Indians. Bose did a lot of significant research in the field of radio waves but he didn't discover them. ATLEAST we can agree upon calling him "Sir". That's a fact that he be called Sir Jagadish Chandra Bose ..... or do we have concerns about that too ???

I personally believe that the amount of academic achievement necessary to become knighted is so immense that a "Sir" does not really add to that person's honour or fame - Bose is not well-known because he was knighted, he was knighted because his fame as a scientist was already exceptional. But that's just my personal opinion on the British honours system. The Manual of Style for biographies says the use of "Sir" is optional, whereas academic titles (such as "Prof." or "Dr.") should not be used. The Indian inventions list uses the title for Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman and Sir John Marshall, so for consisteny we should probably use it for Bose as well. Do you happen to know whether there are any other knighted people mentioned in the list for which we do not give the title? Huon (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good point! I shall keep my eyes open for any errors on the page as far as the "Sir" title goes and anything important. I agree on the consistency part. Coming back to Bose please check this link (just for more curiosity) http://web.mit.edu/varun_ag/www/bose.html It says Bose did invent a solid-state diode detector to detect EM waves and he patented it. There is lot of differences of opinion on the real inventor of wireless telegraphy - Was it really Marconi ? Or Bose ? My money on is on Bose as he did not get the western publicity at that time. Even IEEE has changed its opinion about Bose on this matter. Maybe this needs more research from like minded people.

The diode is already in the list under the heading "Galena, applied use in electronics of"; the galena made solid-state diodes viable and seems to have been the significant improvement over previous gas-based diodes. Regarding the inventor of wireless telegraphy don't forget Nikola Tesla whom the Bose article credits with predating both Bose and Marconi. Huon (talk) 04:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

Please do not add Indic script to the lead of articles as you did at Jamshedpur. There is community consensus that this does not happen. See WP:INDICSCRIPTS. noq (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Legoktm (talk) 08:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war related to article Jamshedpur

It seems that you are inclined to start a edit war for the article Jamshedpur.

As per wikipedia policy it is necessary for me to write in your talk page about the matter before escalating the same.

i.) you are repeatedly editing that Bengali is a major conversational language. Can you please explain on what basis are you writing it. I have been in this city since Childhood and being a bengali never found bengali to be a major conversational language.

ii.) you are repeatedly making a new section of distance between major cities. Can you please explain why this section is important from encyclopaedic point of view? have you been through article outline of other cities?

iii.) You are indulging in personal attacks as seen from the last edit description.

I would like to have a constructive argument on this before finalizing the matter. Request you to either leave your comments here or in the Talk:Jamshedpur (preferred)

Also your continued approach of continuing the edit ear would force me to request for a ban on your user id/ip address. -- devx101 [TALK] 18:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are awaiting your response on the above subject.-- devx101 [TALK] 17:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Point no. ii) does not make any sense. I am not editing point no. ii)

I am only interested in making sure that Bengali is granted a major language status in Jamshedpur. Do you know that there is an agitation to grant Bengali a second language status in the state of Jharkhand. You call yourself a Bengali and you yourself are not aware of facts about your mother tongue. Bengalis were the first to settle in Jamshedpur in huge numbers and Bengali till today stays as a major spoken language in the city of Jamshedpur.

I think this devx101 person should be banned. devx101 is a Bengali language hater and Bengali people hater. When we have a Bengali president in this country how can we tolerate people like devx101 to live in this country. devx101 should be banned because he is a Bengali hater.— Preceding unsigned comment added by L435534l (talk • contribs) 09:32, 20 January 2014

Indents added above. - 220 of ^Borg 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per this series of edits it appear that edit-warring is still occurring at Jamshedpur. 220 of ^Borg 20:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sohail Sen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Sohail Sen''' ({{lang-bn|সোহেল সেন}}) born 24 June 1984) is an Indian [[film composer]], musician and singer who works in [[Bollywood]]. He debuted as a

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hindi Belt, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bengali and Santali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Jamshedpur does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 19:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Your recent editing history at Jamshedpur‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. noq (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:L435534l reported by User:Noq (Result: ). Thank you. noq (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jamshedpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. please do not add in unsourced contentious material. You will need to provide WP:reliable sources that back up the languages you want to add to the infobox. Simply re-adding them again will only get you blocked from editing. noq (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jamshedpur‎. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Again, you ignore warnings and just revert to your preferred version without providing any evidence of its accuracy. If you continue you will be blocked from editing and so will have no influence on the content of this article. It would be better for you to adhere to Wikipedia policies and co-operate with other editors instead of trying to fight them,. noq (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:B_m_d. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. noq (talk) 5:46 pm, Today (UTC+0)

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:B m d with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

L435534l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think this block is unjustified. I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time now. User[B m d] was disrupting and just removing the previous edits of mine. I am from the city of Jamshedpur and know the place very well. User [B m d] should be blocked. He even sent me dirty abuses via Talk. Also, user [Utcursch] has done an edit now. His edit [Languages: Hindi, English] is BIASED and wrong because his mother tongue is Hindi and he is giving importance to Hindi. User [Utcursch] may be in Canada but there is no difference between User [Utcursch] and User [B m d]. Jamshedpur is on the border with West Bengal (where the language is Bengali) and when Jamshedpur was established educated Bengalis came to Jamshedpur and started the city and the city's culture. Hindi and Bhojpuri are side languages of uneducated people who came to Jamshedpur from villages for work. PLEASE LOOK INTO MY APPEAL. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A GOOD CONTRIBUTOR TO WIKIPEDIA. User[Utcursch] and User[B m d] all have ulterior motives and they both belong to Hindi speaking communities from India and that is why they are blindly supporting Hindi. INDIA IS A MULTILINGUAL COUNTRY AND HINDI IS NOT THE SPOKEN LANGUAGE THROUGHOUT INDIA. WE BENGALIS ARE PROUD OF OUR MOTHER TONGUE WHICH WON THE FIRST NOBEL PRIZE OUTSIDE EUROPE (Bengali Rabindranath Tagore was the first non-european to win the Nobel prize in 1914 in Bengali literature).

Decline reason:

Please read WP:NOTTHEM before making another unblock request. You can also only make on appeal at a time, and as such I've cleared the templates from the other half dozen requests you made. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another fact (I am searching for reference articles) is that Bengali is widely spoken language in Jamshedpur (which is in Jharkhand). Jharkhand state is not in the Hindi belt of India. It is a tribal state so putting Hindi as language of Jamshedpur is unjustified. PLEASE LOOK INTO THE MATTER. HOPE THAT HINDI SPEAKING PEOPLE DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ADMINISTRATORS IGNORANCE ABOUT INDIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by L435534l (talk • contribs)

I REQUEST WIKIPEDIA TO TAKE NOTICE OF THIS COMMENT. THE USERS [Utcursch], [Materialscientist], [Jim1138], [Noq] are practicing DISCRIMINATION in their ADMINISTRATION OF WIKIPEDIA EDITS. THEY HAVE NOT TAKEN NOTE OF MY ABOVE APPEALS AND MY DEFENSE W.R.T. THEIR BLOCK OF MY EDITING PRIVILEGES. I SHALL GO TO HIGHER LEVELS IN WIKIPEDIA AGAINST SUCH DISCRIMINATING BEHAVIOR BY USERS SITTING IN UNITED KINGDOM/ EUROPE/ AMERICAS.— Preceding unsigned comment added by L435534l (talk • contribs)

Now the same article on Jamshedpur says, Languages: Hindi, English. Isn't this unsourced contentious material ? Answer this simple question before you block me, Users [Noq], [Jim1138], [Materialscientist]. Do not follow DOUBLE STANDARDS on wikipedia policies.— Preceding unsigned comment added by L435534l (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

L435534l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been a long time since the Block. I have made useful additions to Wikipedia before. Check my history. Therefore please unblock me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, L435534l. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

L435534l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block should be removed L435534l (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.