User talk:L337m4n/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:L337m4n. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Article

I have uploaded a few photos of hin there I just want to create a category for him just like all other youtubers Heffner000 (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Knowledge panel

Hey do you know who owns Cr1TiKaL's knowledge panel? Heffner000 (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 7:34 PM, January 27, 2021 (EST)

-) Heffner000 (talk) 05: 03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Leeham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Leeham, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TommyInnit. This is just a note to tell you how notifications work on this site. The most common way editors will receive notifications is when you edit a user's talk page, or you properly use the {{Reply to}} template (instructions for which can be found here). Just make sure you don't over-use notifications and to always follow the talk page guidelines!

In order to change your own notification settings, please click here. For help fixing failed pings, refer to this how-to-guide. If you have any questions about this, you may like to consult the FAQ or are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sending you this because this is not how you fix pings. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:20, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinesauce (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IceWelder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No major improvements since the last decline. Large parts of the article remain unsourced or sourced to social media and forums, which are not reliable. The sources used need to prove that the subject is notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Please avoid resubmitting the article until these issues are resolved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinesauce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vinesauce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IceWelder [✉] 19:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that you recently removed content from EDP445 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cr1TiKaL, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 00:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)