User talk:Kympubs
No messages have been posted for this user yet. To start a page called User talk:Kympubs, type in the box below. When you are done, preview the page to check for errors and then publish it.
Kympubs, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Kympubs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion has a new comment
[edit]AfC notification: Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion has a new comment
[edit]The article Construction number has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced and mathematically trivial
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Construction number
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Construction number requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 Cúcuta explosion (December 17)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2021 Cúcuta explosion, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Criticism about Greta Thunberg
[edit]Hello Kympubs. I have moved the page you created to Criticism of Greta Thunberg (correcting the grammar) and then blanked-and-redirected it to Greta Thunberg. I did this because 1) we already have comprehensive, well-sourced coverage of criticism and mockery of Thunberg in that article, in the "Public response and impact" section; and 2) we generally don't maintain articles devoted entirely to criticism of a person, especially not a living person, as they violate our neutral point of view and biographies of living persons policy. – Joe (talk) 12:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
"Memes about Greta Thunberg" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Memes about Greta Thunberg. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 19#Memes about Greta Thunberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |