User talk:KyleFN

October 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Nissan 200SX has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nissan 200SX was changed by KyleFN (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892603 on 2013-10-06T12:20:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting

Please understand that WP is trying to take a somewhat global perspective. See WP:WPAC for some points on how we name automobile articles. See WP:3RR for how not to edit. See WP:OWN for another warning regarding your stated aims and means. And please try to engage in constructive conversation instead of just reverting. Mr.choppers | ✎ 21:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please respect the work I've done and stop wholesale deleting my changes. That's incredibly disrespectful of the work I've put in. I fully understand that Wikipedia is a global community, however the United States of America is a part of that community and deserves just as much representation in articles as anywhere else in the world. KyleFN (talk) 23:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read any of the linked articles? And yes, I respect your work, all I'm asking is that you respect others' as well. Hence the need for consensus. Mr.choppers | ✎ 22:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you do not, but whatever, I won't waste anymore time on this nonsense. Create your own damn content. I cleaned up the article so that it makes more sense and only talks about stuff pertaining to the subject of the article. I was getting ready to dump a mountain of new content onto the page, but fuck it. Go ahead and fuck it all up and piss away my work. I was trying to improve an article I have real-world, working knowledge of but I'm done, I have better shit to do with my time. I can see now why Wikipedia has a reputation for running people off that try to contribute to their articles. KyleFN (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A prerequisite for working with others is the ability to work with others. You have to be able to appreciate viewpoints other than your own. You keep stating that there are mechanical differences between the 200SX and the Lucino, but haven't actually listed anything. You also turned a perfectly decent prose section into a horribly formatted bullet list (which I fixed, while incorporating your changes in content because I do believe you to be correct on the tailpipe differences). You have yet to respond to any points I have brought up and reacted to Regushee's attempt at levity by being needlessly offended. You still clearly have not read any of the linked articles I have provided for your benefit, articles that are intended to help you understand how to be part of a collaborative effort. Cheers, have fun, come back when you have chilled out a bit. Mr.choppers | ✎ 22:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly capable of working with others I do it ever day as a game designer. What I am not capable of doing is working with people who wholesale slash & burn my efforts for no goddamn reason. I have read the articles you posted, regardless of your opinions otherwise. However neither of you are even listening/considering my input on this, you're just pushing forward with your own agendas. So why would I continue to make an effort to work with people who won't even try to listen to me and who serve their own personal agendas? KyleFN (talk) 22:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]