User talk:Kygora/Archive 1

Archive 1

Orphaned non-free image File:Falling In Reverse Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Falling In Reverse Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:40, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:FIRTDIMIY Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FIRTDIMIY Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Falling In Reverse (Members)

Please reconsider not putting titles at the end of former members its very confussing and it also discusses the line up changes of previous members on the article. Mikey 21:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I do not see how this is Confusing(Proper spelling btw) you can change it all you want, but I will undo it, for all it is doing is saying which band the former members are in. nothing confusing about that. unless you are 3 years old.

Kygora 21:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay fair enough keep the undo edit but could you please atleast semi protect this article has been created over 50 times and due to bad edits and blanked pages the article was put up for AfD. Mikey 22:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikeyy (talk • contribs)

I will be keeping watch on this Article, and do all i can to keep it alive, ive already petitioned to get it on mainspace, and wikipedia recognizes it as a good article, so any unnecessary and false/bad changes made i will fix as quickly as possible. Also remember to Sign your posts properly using the 4 tildes. you cant use the name Mikey, you have to use Smikeyy

Kygora 22:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

No I am not inpresonating an admin but I do have review privilleges anhd I I reviewed it and I believe the modertors are right and that Falling In Reverse does not just yet meet the requirements. False remarks could end you up with a ban! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smikeyy (talk • contribs) 13:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry you have been having trouble with your Falling in Reverse article. I guess you and GroundZ3R0 002 will be able to get an article that is acceptable by everyone soon when the new album is out and it receives the expected coverage. Is this any use to you: http://www.wikien4.appspot.com/wiki/User:Kygora/Falling_In_Reverse ? Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 09:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC))

Falling in Reverse at AfC

See User_talk:Protonk#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation. Protonk (talk) 04:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Falling In Reverse

Hey. I apologize for getting ahead of ourselves but it seems both the band and the album page for Falling In Reverse has been recreated YET again, so we need to move our pages along sooner than planned. I left a message on User:Jayjg's talk page discussing the matter. I know we haven't had much of a chance to collaborate, but I did take the liberty of scanning over all your formatting, sources, and prose on your pages and taking the best pieces to create the best possible pages on my userspaces. I hope you don't mind. If you have anything useful to add before Jayjg checks over the pages, feel free to add as long as it is sourced and formatted accordingly. Let me know your thoughts, GroundZ3R0 002 21:11, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

• This is great news, we should be able push Falling in Revers in to the mainspace really really soon.. today most likely since they now meet WP:BAND with 100% Certainty and only Retards with no brains will Deny it. I've been keeping an eye on your sandbox3 and is fantastic specially since you took a lot from mine. both the album and artist pages have come along nicely.--Kygora 22:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Hey. Don't worry about genre refs in the infobox for either page, they aren't supposed to be there anyways. I'll see if I can get that other user to stop editwarring the page. GroundZ3R0 002 18:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Please see here for more information. You've made a number of recent edits that conflict with Wikipedia's standards. Please do not continue to add unreferenced or poorly referenced information to the article Falling In Reverse. All such edits will be reverted. Thank you for understanding. --♫ Chris-B-Koolio ♫ ... (Talk) 19:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

References should not be placed in infoboxes, but genres placed in infoboxes should be referenced ones, not just ones that a handful of users decide on based on opinion. --♫ Chris-B-Koolio ♫ ... (Talk) 19:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Falling In Reverse. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Chasingsol^(talk) 18:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• 1: No i was no in an Edit war, i did 2 DIFFERENT reverts.

2: You are a little late.

3: Go Away and Come back when you have a real reason to post this.

--Kygora 19:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect, you may want to read exactly what WP:3RR says. You did violate it, but instead of seeking a block, which likely would have been granted since you reverted at least 4 times, I figured a notification would be more friendly. Please keep it WP:CIVIL too. Wikipedia is a collaboration, nobody WP:OWN's any of the pages. --Chasingsol^(talk) 00:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

FIR

Hey. The alias section should include both FIR and behind these walls, as the band was/is known by those names. The FIR is a common abbreviation used by the media and band itself. FBTW is the former name of the band, and former names are included in alias, see Linkin Park and other wiki bands with former names. Agreed? GroundZ3R0 002 06:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

there is a difference between From behind These Walls and other Bands, Link Park and all them changed their name because they wanted to. FIR changed their name Because they were forced to due to Copyright issues.--Kygora

Speedy deletion nomination of UserTalk:Kygora/WelcomeNotice

A tag has been placed on UserTalk:Kygora/WelcomeNotice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

FIR

Actually, it was other users who added "mixed" to the article. Mixed implies a fairly equal amount of reviews both positive and negative. The album, unfortunately, has gotten a multitude of negative reviews and not as many positive reviews. This is subjective because metacritic does not have a page for the album, but is fairly able to be seen as negative. Because there were a few positive reviews, and to avoid edit wars, I did not revert the edits adding mixed to the page, but negative definitely needs to be there. I believe mixed should be taken off, but "mixed to negative" does work fairly well, so either that or just negative works. Thoughts? GroundZ3R0 002 20:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kygora. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 02:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jayjg ^(talk) 02:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In The Drug in Me Is You, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Norma Jean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Uh, no

Just because YOU think they're metalcore and hard rock, doesn't mean that those genres should be put there. Learn how to use Wikipedia properly, but before you do that, grow up and learn some proper English. If you continue to put that, I will have you blocked from the website. From the looks of this page, I can see that you've caused conflict on Falling in Reverse-related pages in the past. The Catalyst (talk) 19:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

That review on Killyourstereo was submitted by a fan. It also lists the album as "pop". If you wanna add that, then go ahead. iTunes is not defining the genres of the album, it is simply saying what category on the music store that you can find the album, which is also not a viable source. You can find Gym Class Heroes in the Alternative rock section, and I'm pretty sure they're not alternative rock. Pop punk, alternative rock, and post-hardcore are the best. Wanna know a REAL music source? Allmusic: http://allmusic.com/artist/falling-in-reverse-p2417157 It calls the album, as I've said, "Pop punk", "alternative rock", and "post-hardcore". So LEAVE IT AT THAT. And hmm, who's the "wrong" one now? And LOL, you're telling me to leave the genres on FIR's page alone, then you say you're not supposed to reference the genres. Learn how to use Wikipedia. Please. The Catalyst (talk) 00:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)